Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v Johnson & Johnson Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 1976 |
| Date | 1976 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
64 cases
-
HTC Corpn v Nokia Corpn
...an injunction pending appeal was explained by Buckley LJ in Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Johnson & Johnson Ltd (No.3) [1976] RPC 671 at 676: "It is not in dispute that where a plaintiff has at first instance established a right to a perpetual injunction, the court has a di......
- 1. Cosmetic Warriors Ltd and Another v 1. Amazon.Company UK Ltd and Another
-
SmithKline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd
...in damages should the appeal be successful, see the 3M case, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Johnson & Johnson [1976] RPC 671 46 However, because the point has been fully argued, and counsel's researches have extended far and wide, I think it worth exploring the question of wh......
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
...“The balance of convenience principle” was explained by Buckley LJ in Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v Johnson and Johnson [1976] RPC 671 at page 676: “It is not in dispute that where a plaintiff has at first instance established a right to a perpetual injunction, the court ahs......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Neurim Again! Final Injunctions - To Stay Or Not To Stay, That Was The Question
...(whether there is a "genuine chance of success" on appeal) set out in Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Johnson & Johnson Ltd [1976] RPC 671, was not satisfied. As such, Marcus Smith J considered it proper to grant Neurim a permanent injunction and refuse any stay. He also proceeded t......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...510, 512 THE LAW OF EQUITABLE REMEDIES 760 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Johnson & Johnson Ltd, [1976] FSR 139, [1976] RPC 671 (CA) ......................................................... 324 Mission Capital plc v Sinclair, [2008] EWHC 1339 (Ch) .................................. ......
-
Table of Cases
...S.C.C.A. No. 424 ..................... 200, 366, 368 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Johnson & Johnson Ltd., [1976] F.S.R. 139, [1976] R.P.C. 671 (C.A.) ...................... 221 Mission Capital plc. v. Sinclair, [2008] EWHC 1339 (Ch.) ................................414 Missouri v......
