Mint v Good
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council, C.A.
...been made the subject of an express term. 24 Mr. Beney relied strongly on something said by Lord Somervell in this Court in the case of Mint V. Good, 1951, 1 King's Bench, page 517. The question which there arose was in reference to liability for a nuisance on premises to a passer - by on t......
-
Brew Brothers Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd
...to the less dogmatic views expressed in other textbooks cited to the Court. Mr. Drake, on the other hand, referred to ( Mint v. Good 1951 1 King's Bench 517) and the cases there cited: he then submitted that even if the older authorities supported Mr. Blundells submission (which he conteste......
-
McAuley v Bristol City Council
... ... (d) Pay to the Council the cost of making good all damage to the premises (other than that resulting from ordinary fair wear and tear) including broken windows, on the fixtures and fittings ... Further, it was argued that an implied right to enter and to do repairs to the garden, including the step, should be implied at law: see Mint v. Good [1951] 1 K.B. 517 ... The council, in the circumstances of this case, should be held to have had the implied right to do any repairs which ... ...
-
Hunter et al. v. Canary Wharf Ltd.; Hunter et al. v. London Docklands Development Corp., (1997) 215 N.R. 1 (HL)
...(1992), 419 S.E.2d 661 (Va.), refd to. [para. 107]. Martin Davies Case (1990), 20 W.A.L.R. 129, refd to. [para. 113]. Mint v. Good, [1951] 1 K.B. 517 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Jacobs v. London County Council, [1950] A.C. 361 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 113]. Hale v. Jennings Brothers, [1938] 1 Al......
Get Started for Free