Miss S Holmes v Tellemachus Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeJudge Tayler
Neutral Citation[2022] EAT 71
Subject MatterNot landmark
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Published date19 May 2022
Judgment approved by the court Miss S Holmes v Tellemachus Ltd
Page 1 [2022] EAT 71
© EAT 2022
Neutral Citation Number: [2022] EAT 71
Case No: EA-2019-001131-LA
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Rolls Building
Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL
Date: 24th March 2022
Before:
HIS HONOUR JUDGE JAMES TAYLER
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between:
MISS S HOLMES Appellant
- and -
TELLEMACHUS LTD Respondent
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr J Stuart (instructed by Advocate ) for the Appellant
Mr R Kohanzad (instructed by Cronor Group Ltd) for the Respondent
Hearing date: 24th March 2022
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ms M Abimbola v Global Banking School Ltd: 1804945/2023
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 22 April 2024
    ...the innocent party will then be discharged from complying with its own obligations under the contract, see Holmes v Tellemachus Ltd [2022] EAT 71. It would be peculiar and unfair were that not the case. Authorities which deal with restrictive covenants in restraint of trade not uncommonly r......
  • Miss L Singh v Optimal Claim Ltd (T/a Optimal Solicitors): 2402039/2022 and 2405578/2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 15 March 2023
    ...in the Response to the Counterclaim at paragraphs 9 to 12 as summarised below. He relies upon the cases of Holmes v Tellemachus Limited [2022] EAT 71 and Ali v Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago [2017] IRLR 432, PC in support of the implication of a term that disentitles the employer ......
  • Mr B Deans v Mr F Shewan: 4101094/2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 24 May 2022
    ...appreciate. In so far as the pleading of a constructive dismissal claim is concerned the very recent EAT case of Holmes v Telemachus Ltd [2022] EAT 71 15 confirmed that, particularly where the claimant was a party it was not necessary to plead the test specifically under sections 95 and 98 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT