Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Date | 1963 |
| Year | 1963 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
29 cases
-
Hall & Company Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council
...as authorising a radical departure from the general law relating to highways. The principle is stated in Mixnam's Properties Limited v. Chertsey Urban District Council (1963 volume 3 Weekly Law Reports, page 38), at page 43 per Lord Justice Willmer, at pages 49 and 50 and Lord Justice Danok......
-
Jamaica Public Service Company Ltd v Meadows and Others
... ... of the corporate area, and a parish council, in respect of parishes outside of the corporate ... Others [1997] 1 ILRM 241 , Birkdale District Electricity Supply Company Limited v Corporation ... UDC and Another [1964] 1 WLR 240 and Chertsey UDC v Mixnam's Properties Limited [1965] AC 735 ... ...
-
Hillary v Minister for Education
...3 I.R. 283. Mixnam's Properties Ltd. v. Chertsey Urban District Council [1964] 1 Q.B. 214; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 38; [1963] 2 All E.R. 787; (1963) 61 L.G.R. 261. North Western Health Board v. H. W. [2001] 3 I.R. 622. The State (Lynch) v. Cooney [1982] I.R. 337; [1983] I.L.R.M. 89. The State (Quin......
-
R v Independent Television Commission and Others
...which comes closest to the present context is that of Lord Upjohn in Mixnam's Properties Ltd. V. Chertsey Urban District Council [1965] AC 735, 764: "…..freedom to contract between the subjects of this country is a fundamental right even today, and if Parliament intends to empower a third p......
Get Started for Free
