MK (by Her Litigation Friend RK) v Oldham NHS Trust
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
J.D. v. East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust et al., (2005) 337 N.R. 74 (HL)
...J., granted the application of the fifth and sixth respondents, the health authority and the doctor, and dismissed the action: [2003] Lloyd's Rep. Med. 1. He concluded that it was not fair, just and reasonable to impose any duty of care to the parents in the circumstances and that MK had no......
-
Kimathi and Others v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office
...that “the law prior to the Human Rights Act 1998 was clear.” 18 Further, paragraph 112 of those submissions cited the case of RK and MK v Oldham NHS Trust 19 for the proposition that “the situation regarding damages for distress was reappraised after the Human Rights Act 1998… first, parent......
-
D v East Berkshire Community NHS Trust and Another
...Simon J granted the application of the fifth and sixth respondents, the health authority and the doctor, and dismissed the action: [2003] Lloyd's Rep Med 1. He concluded that it was not fair, just and reasonable to impose any duty of care to the parents in the circumstances and that MK had......
-
D v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council; H v Same
...Trust and Dr Blumenthal for psychiatric injury resulting from their separation from M. On the hearing of preliminary issues Simon J [2003] Lloyd's Rep Med 1 held that neither defendant owed a duty of care to the parents. The daughter M was herself a claimant in the proceedings, but Simon J ......
Request a trial to view additional results