Modelling and optimisation of Indian traditional agriculture supply chain to reduce post-harvest loss and CO2 emission

Pages1817-1841
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0383
Published date16 October 2017
Date16 October 2017
AuthorManivannan Chandrasekaran,Rajesh Ranganathan
Subject MatterInformation & knowledge management,Information systems,Data management systems,Knowledge management,Knowledge sharing,Management science & operations,Supply chain management,Supply chain information systems,Logistics,Quality management/systems
Modelling and optimisation of
Indian traditional agriculture
supply chain to reduce
post-harvest loss and CO
2
emission
Manivannan Chandrasekaran and Rajesh Ranganathan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology,
Coimbatore, India
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reduce the post-harvest loss occurring through respiration and
CO
2
emission produce by the selected produces, during logistics. This paper proposes a supply chain (SC)
structure for the Indian traditional agriculture SC planning model to reduce post-harvest loss and mixed
closed transportation to reduce CO
2
emission.
Design/methodology/approach The Indian agriculture SC structure is modeled and solved by genetic
algorithm using a MATLAB Optimization toolbox. The respiration rate is measured by a static method.
These values are applied in an SC planning model and the post-harvest loss and its corresponding CO
2
emission are estimated.
Findings This paper proposes a supply structure for the Indian traditional agriculture SC to reduce the
post-harvest loss; the experiments measured the respiration rate to estimate the CO
2
emission. The mixed
closed transportation method is found to be suitable for short-purpose domestic transportation.
Research limitations/implications The optimized supply structure leads to unemployment through
eliminating the intermediaries. Therefore, further research encourages the conversion of intermediaries into
hub instead of eliminating them.
Practical implications This paper includes implications for the development of Indian traditional
agriculture SC by an optimized supply structure and novel transportation method for the selected agriculture
produces based on compatibility.
Originality/value This paper identified that the agriculture produces respiration can also emit the CO
2
.
The closed transportation method can reduce the CO
2
emission of produces respiration than traditional open
transportation.
Keywords Transportation, Carbon dioxide emission, Post-harvest losses, Respiration,
Supply chain planning
Paper type Research paper
Nomenclature
Sets
nProduces
fFarmers
gAgents
aAuctioneers
lWhole sellers
rRetail store
eCustomer
DDemand or production
QSupply quantity
TTransport quantity
WLoss quantity
PQ Supply percentage
PW Loss percentage
CCarbon dioxide emission
Industrial Management & Data
Systems
Vol. 117 No. 9, 2017
pp. 1817-1841
Emerald Publishing Limited
0263-5577
DOI 10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0383
Received 20 September 2016
Revised 28 February 2017
30 May 2017
Accepted 14 June 2017
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/0263-5577.htm
© Manivannan Chandrasekaran and Rajesh Ranganathan. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may
reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article ( for both commercial &
non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full
terms of this licence may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1817
Indian
traditional
agriculture
supply chain
Decision variables
D
n
Demand or production of n
produces
PQ
nfg
Supply percentage of produce n
from farmer to agent
PQ
nfa
Supply percentage of produce n
from farmer to auctioneer
PQ
nfl
Supply percentage of produce n
from farmer to whole seller
PQ
nfr
Supply percentage of produce n
from farmer to retail store
PQ
nfe
Supply percentage of produce n
from farmer to customer
PQ
nga
Supply percentage of produce n
from agent to auctioneer
PQ
ngl
Supply percentage of produce n
from agent to whole seller
PQ
ngr
Supply percentage of produce n
from agent to retail store
PQ
nge
Supply percentage of produce n
from agent to customer
PQ
nal
Supply percentage of produce n
from auctioneer to whole seller
PQ
nar
Supply percentage of produce n
from auctioneer to retail store
PQ
nae
Supply percentage of produce n
from auctioneer to customer
PQ
nlr
Supply percentage of produce n
from whole seller to retail store
PQ
nle
Supply percentage of produce n
from whole seller to customer
PQ
nre
Supply percentage of produce n
from retail to customer
PW
nf
Loss percentage of produce nat famer
PW
ng
Loss percentage of produce nat agent
PW
na
Loss percentage of produce nat
auctioneer
PW
nl
Loss percentage of produce nat
whole seller
PW
nr
Loss percentage of produce nat
retail store
PW
nfg
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from farmer to agent
PW
nfa
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from farmer to auctioneer
PW
nfl
Loss percentage of producenduri ng
transport fromfarmer to whole seller
PW
nfr
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from farmer to retail store
PW
nfe
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from farmer to customer
PW
nga
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from agent to auctioneer
PW
ngl
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from agent to whole seller
PW
ngr
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from agent to retail store
PW
nge
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from agent to customer
PW
nal
Loss percentage of produce n
during transport from auctioneer
to whole seller
PW
nar
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from auctioneer to
retail store
PW
nae
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from auctioneer to
customer
PW
nlr
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from whole seller to retail
store
PW
nle
Loss percentage of produce nduring
transport from whole seller to
customer
C
n
Carbon dioxide emission rate of
produce n
Other parameters
Q
nf
Capacity of farmer
Q
ng
Capacity of agent
Q
na
Capacity of auctioneer
Q
nl
Capacity of whole seller
Q
nr
Capacity of retail
Q
nfg
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
farmer to agent
Q
nfa
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
farmer to auctioneer
Q
nfl
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
farmer to whole seller
Q
nf
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
farmer to retail store
Q
nfe
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
farmer to customer
Q
nga
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
agent to auctioneer
Q
ngl
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
agent to whole seller
Q
ngr
Supply quantity of produce nfrom
agent to retail store
1818
IMDS
117,9

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT