Monk v Warbey
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1934 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
82 cases
-
Michael Howe v Motor Insurers' Bureau
...case. 19 In the case of Norman v Ali and Aziz [2000] Lloyds Rep IR 395 the Court of Appeal decided that a claim based on the principle in Monk v Warbey came within the provisions of section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980. The material wording of section 11 is "Whether damages claimed by the ......
-
Richardson v Pitt-Stanley
...for each day that an offence is committed. 12 The ratio of the judgment of the Learned Judge was that this case is on all fours with Monk v Warbey (1935) 1 QB75 and that consequently civil liability attaches to the employers who are in breach of Section 1 of the Act. Having referred to Sect......
-
Coote v Stone
...I cannot see that it gives rise to any private liability. 9 We were referred in answer by Sir Joseph Molony to the well-known cases of Monk v. Warbey (1935 1 King's Bench, 75) and London Passenger Transport Board v. Upson (1949 Appeal Cases, 155), where a breach of a duty was held to give r......
- All persons in occupation of the house and the wooden stores erected on a portion of land held under Grant No 26977 for Lot 4271 in the Township of Johor Bahru, Johor v Punca Klasik Sdn Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Misfeasance in public office: a very peculiar tort.
...Act 1958 (Vic) ss 84(2), (4). (180) K M Stanton, Breach of Statutory Duty in Tort (Sweet & Maxwell, 1986) 26, citing Monk v Warbey [1935] 1 KB 75. The replacement work does not pursue the issue: see Stanton et al, above n (181) Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra (2009) 237 CLR 215, 263-4 (Crenn......
-
Tort law, risk, and technological innovation in England.
...(61) Ibid at 667. (62) See Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Co Ltd (1923), 2 KB 832 (CA) [Phillips], (63) See e.g. Monk v Warbey, [1935] 1 KB 75 (owner's failure to (64) Spencer, supra note 51 at 80-82. (65) See generally Peter Bartrip, "No-Fault Compensation on the Roads in Twentieth ......
-
“ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE”
...not exceeding 3 months or to both … 15 See further, MacGillivray & Parkington on Insurance Law (8th Ed, 1988), at paras 2105—2108. 16 [1935] 1 KB 75. 17 However, the mere existence of this means of claiming from the MIB does not, of itself, absolve the person in breach of his statutory duty......