Monro (George) Ltd v American Cyanamid, Company, Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1944
Year1944
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
38 cases
  • Castree v E. R Squibb & Sons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 April 1980
    ...should be the determining factor". 10 Mr. Livesey relied heavily upon a case in this court, the case of George Monro Ltd. v. American Cyanamid & Chemical Corporation, reported in ( 1944) 1 King's Bench, 432, and maintained that that was authority for the proposition that where everythin......
  • Grehan v Medical Incorporated and Valley Pines Associates
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 March 1986
    ...2 IR 619 M'CULLAGH V THE IRISH FREE STATE 57 ILTR 171 MALICIOUS INJURIES (IRL) ACT, 1853 S1 MONRO LTD V AMERICAN CYANAMID & CHEMICAL CORPO 1944 KB 432, 1944 1 AER 386 MORAN V PYLE NATIONAL (CANADA) LTD 1974 2 WWR 586 MORAN V PYLE NATIONAL (CANADA) LTD 43 DLR 3d 249 MULTINATIONAL GAS (PETRO......
  • Metall Und Rohstoff A.G. (Respondents (Plaintiffs) v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc. and Another (Appellants
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 February 1989
  • Cecil & others v Ehsanollah Bayat & others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 May 2011
    ... ... (A Company Incorporated in New Jersey, Usa) (3) ... There was no American legal evidence before him to the effect that the ... 63 Similarly, in George Monro Limited v. American Cyanamid and Chemical ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 82-2, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...North, ‘Thoughts on the Place of Commission of aNon-Statutory Tort’ (1965) 14 ICLQ 1814.13 George Monro vAmerican Cyanamid Chemical Corp [1944] KB 432 (HL); followed in CordovaLandCo Ltd vVictor Bros Inc [1966] 1 WLR 793 (QB). See further, Collins, ‘Some Aspects of ServiceOut’ n 5 above.14 ......
  • JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...per Diplock LJ; The Chapparal[1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 158, 163, per Diplock LJ; George Monro Ltd v American Cyanamid and Chemical Corporation[1944] KB 432, 437, per Scott LJ. 10 Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1993] 3 WLR 756; [1993] 3 All ER 756. 11 Johnson v Taylor......
  • Conflict of Laws Through Nigerian Case Law: A Researcher's Critical Comments (Part 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press African Journal of International and Comparative Law No. , October 2012
    • 1 October 2012
    ...the harm was done and not the place where it was suffered6767 Counsel cited George Munroe Ltd v American Cynamid and Chemical Corporation (1944) KB 432, 444. However, that case decided the opposite. See our discussion infra. is ‘the place of the tort’ and that having interest or shares in E......
  • NOTES AND COMMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1990, December 1990
    • 1 December 1990
    ...is a proper one for such service when an application is made under these Rules. See eg. George MonroLtd v American Cyanamid Corporation[1944] KB 432; The Brado[1979] AC 326; Mackender v Feldia[1967] 2 QB 590. In this connection, the distinction must be noted between getting leave to serve p......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT