Monro (George) Ltd v American Cyanamid, Company, Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1944
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
36 cases
5 books & journal articles
  • Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 82-2, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...North, ‘Thoughts on the Place of Commission of aNon-Statutory Tort’ (1965) 14 ICLQ 1814.13 George Monro vAmerican Cyanamid Chemical Corp [1944] KB 432 (HL); followed in CordovaLandCo Ltd vVictor Bros Inc [1966] 1 WLR 793 (QB). See further, Collins, ‘Some Aspects of ServiceOut’ n 5 above.14 ......
  • JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...per Diplock LJ; The Chapparal[1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 158, 163, per Diplock LJ; George Monro Ltd v American Cyanamid and Chemical Corporation[1944] KB 432, 437, per Scott LJ. 10 Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1993] 3 WLR 756; [1993] 3 All ER 756. 11 Johnson v Taylor......
  • Conflict of Laws Through Nigerian Case Law: A Researcher's Critical Comments (Part 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • African Journal of International and Comparative Law No. , October 2012
    • 1 October 2012
    ...the harm was done and not the place where it was suffered6767 Counsel cited George Munroe Ltd v American Cynamid and Chemical Corporation (1944) KB 432, 444. However, that case decided the opposite. See our discussion infra. is ‘the place of the tort’ and that having interest or shares in E......
  • NOTES AND COMMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1990, December 1990
    • 1 December 1990
    ...is a proper one for such service when an application is made under these Rules. See eg. George MonroLtd v American Cyanamid Corporation[1944] KB 432; The Brado[1979] AC 326; Mackender v Feldia[1967] 2 QB 590. In this connection, the distinction must be noted between getting leave to serve p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT