Moor v Lawson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1915 |
| Year | 1915 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
90 cases
- Bandar Teknik Sdn Bhd & 3 Ors v Desa Samudera Sdn Bhd
-
Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 3)
...by a judge or a jury, the mere fact that the case is weak, and not likely to succeed, is no ground for striking it out ( Moore v Lawson (1915) 31 TLR 418, CA; Wenlock v Moloney [1965] 1 WLR 1238; [1965] 2 All ER 871, CA);" Therefore if a plaintiff would be entitled to judgment if he were ......
-
Arnage Holdings Ltd and Four Others v Walkers (A Firm)
...45, referred to. (46)Midland Bank v. Hett, Stubbs Kemp, [1979] Ch. 384; [1979] 3 All E.R. 571, referred to. (47)Moore v. Lawson (1915), 31 T.L.R. 418, referred to. (48)Myers v. Elman, [1940] A.C. 282; [1939] 4 All E.R. 484; (1939), 162 L.T. 113; 56 T.L.R. 177; 109 L.J.K.B. 105, considered. ......
-
Arnage Holdings Ltd v Walkers
...a Judge or a jury, the mere fact that the case is weak, and not likely to succeed, is no ground for striking it out ( Moore v Lawson (1915) 31 T.L.R. 418, CA; Wenlock v Moloney [1965] 1 W.L.R. 1238; [1965] 2 All E.R. 871, CA.”. 220 Within the meaning of the case law as recently discussed ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Action
...by a Judge or jury, the mere fact that the case is weak and not likely to succeed is no ground for striking it out. ( Moore v. Lawson 31 T.L.R 418 C.A.; Wenlock v. Moloney (1965) W.L.R. 1238; (1965) 2 All E.R. 371 C.A.). Where the statement of claim discloses no cause of action and if the C......
-
Preliminary sections
...887 Moore & Anor. v. Assignments Courier Ltd. (1977) 1 W.L.R. 638……...............................……128 Moore v. Lawson 31 T.L.R. 418 C.A………….....................................................................…434, 435 Moore v. Tayee (1934) 2 W.A.C.A. 43……........................................
-
REASONABLE CAUSE OF ACTION
...by a Judge or Jury, the mere fact that the case is weak and not likely to succeed is no ground for striking it out (Moore v. Lawson 31 T.L.R. 418 C.A.; Wenlock v. Moloney (1965) 1 W.L.R 1238; (1965) 2 All E.R. 871 C.A.). Where the statement of claim discloses no cause of action and if the C......