Moore v I. Bresler Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1944 |
Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA ((in Liquidation)) (No. 15), Re; Bank of India v Morris
... ... permission to amend is made after the expiry of the relevant limitation period: see the decision of this court in Re Farmizer (Products) Ltd, Moore v Gadd [1997] BCC 655 ... It is also common ground that the effect of the amendment would be to add a "new claim" within the meaning of section ... ...
-
St Regis Paper Company Ltd v The Crown
...requiring mens rea where the employee could hardly be described as the directing mind and will of the company. For example, in Moore v I. Bresler Ltd. [1944] 2 All E.R. 515 the Divisional Court imposed liability on the company for false returns in respect of purchase tax made with an intent......
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Greener Solutions Ltd
...Funds Management Asia v Securities Commission ELR[1995] 2 AC 500 Mobilx Ltd v R & C Commrs VAT[2010] BVC 638 Moore v I Bresler Ltd UNK[1944] 2 All ER 515 Optigen Ltd v C & E Commrs ECASECASECASVAT(Joined Cases C-354/03, C-355/03 and C-484/03) [2006] BVC 119; [2006] ECR I-483 Staatssecretari......
-
Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd
...held that the mens rea of the servant authorised to discharge the duty to make the return should be attributed to the company: see Moore v. I. Bresler Ltd. [1944] 2 All E.R. 515. On the other hand, the fact that a company's employee is authorised to drive a lorry does not in itself lead to......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Austeville Properties Ltd. v. Josan Et Al.: Exploding Taco Del Mar Makes For Interesting Application Of The Corporate Identification Doctrine And New Law On Insurance Covenants
...directors committing misconduct within the very nature of their role in the company. For example, see: Moore v. I. Bresler Ltd., [1944] 2 All ER 515; Canadian Dredge; Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwen Easson (1993), 102 D.L.R.(4th) 1 The trial judge also found that Mrs. Nandha's actions, while ......
8 books & journal articles
-
Tyler G. Banks, Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute: the Second Circuit?s Misstep Around General Principles of Law in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
...212 U.S. 481 (1909); Dir. of Pub. Prosecutionsv. Kent & Sussex Contractors, Ltd., [1944] K.B. 146 (U.K.); Moore v. I. Bresler, Ltd., [1944] 2 All E.R. 515 (U.K.); R v. I.C.R. Haulage, Ltd., [1944] K.B. 551 (Crim. App.) (U.K.).Stessens, supra note 223, at 497.V.S. Khanna, Corporate Criminal ......
-
CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION
...at 713–714. 96DPP v Kent and Sussex Contractors LtdELR[1944] KB 146; R v ICR Haulage Co LtdELR[1944] KB 551; Moore v I Bresler LtdUNK[1944] 2 All ER 515. 97Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v NattrassELR[1972] AC 153 at 171 (HL). 98 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission [19......
-
Corporate Manslaughter: A Radical Reform?
...Ltd [1944] KB 146 (on a charge ofdeception), R vICR Haulage Ltd [1944] KB 551 (on a charge of conspiracy) andMoore vI Bresler Ltd [1944] 2 All ER 515 (on a charge of fraudulent evasion of tax).See generally, C. Wells, Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd edn (OxfordUniversity Press......
-
Chapter 11. United Kingdom Corporate Criminal Liability and the Bribery Act 2010
...may be liable for the act of its servant even though that act was done in fraud of the company itself— Moore v. I. Bressler, Ltd. [1944] 2 All ER 515. 4. In seeking to identify the “directing mind” of a company, prosecutors will need to consider the constitution of the company concerned (wi......
Request a trial to view additional results