Morgan v Thomas
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1881 |
| Year | 1881 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
- Applin (A.P.) v Race Relations Board
-
King Eeducational Service Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Skills Quality Authority (No 3)
...Affairs v Baker (1997) 73 FCR 187 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Morgan v Thomas (1882) 9 QBD 643 NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228; 123 FCR 298 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Au......
-
Tan Kah Fatt
...v Hanbury 3 Ves. 259; per Lord Watson, Hickling v Fair [1899] AC 15) (b) Its popular meaning is “children” (per Jessel MR, Morgan v Thomas 9 QBD 643; and per James and Brett LJJ, Ralph v Carrick 11 CH D 873);… In its popular meaning it is a designation of persons; whilst in its technical im......
-
Gaelcrann Teoranta v Payne
..."or" can never mean "and" although it it sometimes used by mistake when "and" is intended: See Sir George Jessel M.R. in Morgan .v. Thomas 9 Q.B.D. 643, 645 and MacKinnon, J. in Brown & Co. .v. T. & J. Harrison (1927) 43 T.L.R. 394. On the other hand, there is also the high authority of Ban......
Get Started for Free