Morgans v Director of Public Prosecution (pet. all.)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN,LORD STEYN,LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD,LORD CLYDE |
| Judgment Date | 17 February 2000 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2000] UKHL J0217-3 |
| Date | 17 February 2000 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
R v Ebanks
...J.) R. and E.K. EBANKS Ms. L. Manson, Crown Counsel, for the Crown; M. Wingrave for the defendant. Cases cited: (1) Morgans v. D.P.P., [2001] 1 A.C. 315; [2000] 2 W.L.R. 386; [2000] 2 All E.R. 522; [2000] 2 Cr. App. R. 113, followed. (2) Porter v. H.M. Advocate, 2005 1 J.C. 141; 2005 SLT 27......
-
R v E (Leon)
...were en route to the public telecommunication system. 26 The same applies to the decision of the House of Lords in DPP v Morgans [2000] 2 Cr App R 113. The House was there dealing with surveillance of a prisoner's telephone calls taking place before the coming into force of RIPA. It followe......
-
R v P (Telephone Intercepts: Admissibility of Evidence)
...the Convention. In relation to the policy of English law, they relied particularly upon R v Preston [1994] 2 AC 130 and Morgans v DPP [2000] 2 WLR 386. In relation to the Convention, arguments are advanced under both Article 8 and Article 6. These Articles provide 21"Article 8 1. Everyone......
-
R v Ian Michael Sargent
...offence under section 1 has been committed by any of the persons mentioned in section 9(2). In Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions [2001] 1 AC 315, 406 it was recognised that it would be an extraordinary and unacceptable anomaly if the position were to be that evidence obtained by any......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Inadmissibility of Intercept Evidence
...at www.justice.org.uk/inthenews/index.html, accessed 9 November 2006. Khan v United Kingdom (2001) 31 EHRR 45 at 1016.Morgans v DPP [2001] 1 AC 315, [2000] 2 All ER 522.Peter Murphy, Murphy on Evidence (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2005) 53–5. PG and JH v United Kingdom, The Times (19 O......