Morton v Chief Adjudication Officer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
JF CCS 506 2012
...due”. The reference to “due” suggests there must usually be some underlying entitlement. 26. Thus in Morton v Chief Adjudication Officer [1988] IRLR 444, also reported as R(U) 1/88, a case which turned on the meaning of “payable” under the old unemployment benefit scheme, Slade LJ observed ......
-
Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd v Central Provident Fund Board
...to be paid by the employer to the employee during any particular week? (emphasis added) 16 Morton v The Chief Adjudication Officer [1988] IRLR 444 was a case in which an employee was awarded compensation for wrongful dismissal. However, the employers in question were in liquidation. The emp......
-
CCS 1664 2007
...Howard v James especially helpful in the present context. 14. As the Court of Appeal observed in Morton v Chief Adjudication Officer [1988] I.R.L.R. 444, also reported as R(U) 1/88, a case turning on the meaning of “payable” in relation to unemployment benefit: “The word ‘payable’ is not a ......
-
Minera Las Bambas SA v Glencore Queensland Ltd
...set out below, they were of limited assistance. 41 Counsel for the defendants relied on dicta in Morton v The Chief Adjudication Officer [1988] IRLR 444 (CA). In that case the question on the appeal was whether, on the true construction of the Social Security Regulations, Mrs Morton was ent......
Request a trial to view additional results