Moses Hinds Elkanah Hutchinson Henry Martin Samuel Thomas v R and; DPP v Trevor Jackson Attorney-General Intervener
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1975 |
| Year | 1975 |
| Date | 1975 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
119 cases
-
Emma Hlppolyte Applicant v Attorney General Respondent [ECSC]
... ... H. Deterville for Applicant ... Mr. E. Thomas, Solicitor-General, and Mrs. A.—Foster for the ... and he referred to the case of Hinds v Queen (1975) 24 W.I.R. page 330 letter (1) ... ...
-
Emma Hippolyte Applicant v Attorney General Respondent [ECSC]
... ... and he referred to the case of Hinds v Queen (1975) 24 W.I.R. page 330 letter (1) ... He referred in this context to Thomas v A.G. of Trinidad and Tobago 1981 3 W.L.R. 601 ... ...
- Whitfield v Attorney-General
-
Attorney General Appellant v [1] Bernard Coard [2] Callistus Bernard [3] Lester Redhead [4] Christopher Stroude [5] Hudson Austin [6] Liam James [7] Leon Cornwall [8] John Anthony Ventour [9] Dave Bartholomew [10] Ewart Layne [11] Colville Mc Barnette [12] Selwyn Stachan [13] Cecil Prime Respondents [ECSC]
...Council Appeal No. 19 of 2001, at paragraph 35. 21Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody, supra. 22 [1975] 24 WIR 326. 23 Privy Council Appeal No. 88 of 24Erven Warnink BV v. Townsend & Sons (No. 2) [1982] 3 All ER 312 at 320. 25Savarin v. Williams, Civil Appe......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Our Inherent Constitution
...And inally, it will be explained more 1. [2006] CCJ 3 (AJ), (2006) 69 WIR 104 (Bdos). 2. Ibid 20 (emphasis added). 3. [1977] AC 195, (1975) 24 WIR 326 (PC Ja). Our Inherent Constitution fully why treating the rule of law as an unwritten constitutional norm can be a good development for Cari......
-
Juridical and Constitutional Implications of CARICOM Treaty Practice
...of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273. 88. (1999) 2 LRC. 89. (2005) 65 WIR 268. 90. Moses Hinds v The Queen (1975) 24 WIR 326 at 332. 9. (1999) 2 LRC. 92. Neville Lewis v AG of Jamaica [2001] 2 AC 50 at p. 85 per Lord Slynn of Hadley. 93. Boyce & Joseph v AG of Barbado......
-
Constitutionalism in Belize: Lessons for the Commonwealth Caribbean?
...by 1964. 5. (1981) 31 WIR 498 (PC T&T). 6. (1969) 15 WIR 229 (PC T&T). 7. (1967) 10 WIR 299 (PC Ja). 8. (1979) 44 WIR 107 (PC Ber). 9. (1975) 24 WIR 326 (PC Ja). 10. (1978) 30 WIR 310 (PC T&T). 11. See L. Jackson’s ‘Fi Wi Law,’ Chapter 1 which provides an engaging, if withering, account of ......
-
The caribbean court of justice: an historic necessity
...judges used to sit in the Privy Council in earlier times. The production line of Caribbean lawyers has not 22. [1980] AC 319. 23. (1975) 24 WIR 326. 24. (1978) 30 WIR 310. 25. [1982] AC 113. 26. (1994) 45 WIR 94. 88 Caribbean Law Review come to a standstill. But any assumption of infallibil......
Get Started for Free