Moses v Lovegrove
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
-
Roslyn Burton Appellant v Bertillia Christopher Respondent [ECSC]
...that she had the intention to possess the land to the exclusion of all other persons. (Mr. Davidson Riviere included). 6 The case ofMoses v Lovegrove 1952 1AER page 1277 was considered. It is our view that the facts of that case do not deal with matters related to the facts of this present ......
-
Hayward v Chaloner
...had remained in actual possess on for twelve years from 1942 onwards, paying no rent, he would have acquired a squatter's title, see Moses v. Lovegrove, 1952, 2 Q. B., p. 531. But he did not remain in possession for twelve years. He was only there for four years. Then a gap of three months.......
-
Long v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
...and "operate as a lease" or "create an estate": see Doe d Landsell v GowerENR ((1851) 17 QB 589, 599, 600) and Moses v LovegroveELR ([1952] 2 QB 533, 536, 543). The next question was whether the tenancy document, given that it was clearly not by deed, succeeded in operating in accordance wi......
-
Jessamine Investment Company v Schwartz
...to me to be quite irreconcilable not only with the terms of section 9 but with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the" case of Moses v. Lovegrove (1952) 2 Queen's Bench 533. Lord Evershed, at page 542, said this: "Possession, as I have said, for the purposes of this Limitation Act, 193......
Request a trial to view additional results