Moses v Lovegrove
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1952 |
| Year | 1952 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
57 cases
-
Roslyn Burton Appellant v Bertillia Christopher Respondent [ECSC]
...that she had the intention to possess the land to the exclusion of all other persons. (Mr. Davidson Riviere included). 6 The case ofMoses v Lovegrove 1952 1AER page 1277 was considered. It is our view that the facts of that case do not deal with matters related to the facts of this present ......
-
Long v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
...interest" and "operate as a lease" or "create an estate": see Doe d Landsell v GowerENR ((1851) 17 QB 589, 599, 600) and Moses v LovegroveELR ([1952] 2 QB 533, 536, 543). The next question was whether the tenancy document, given that it was clearly not by deed, succeeded in operating in acc......
-
Jessamine Investment Company v Schwartz
...to me to be quite irreconcilable not only with the terms of section 9 but with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the" case of Moses v. Lovegrove (1952) 2 Queen's Bench 533. Lord Evershed, at page 542, said this: "Possession, as I have said, for the purposes of this Limitation Act, 193......
-
Hayward v Chaloner
...were content that the Rector should not pay his rent and did not bother to ask for it for all those years. In Moses v. Lovegrove, 1952, 2 Q. B. 533, in this Court it was assumed on all hands that when Section 9 apparently operates, adverse possession starts: see especially Lord Evershed, Ma......
Request a trial to view additional results