Motemtronic Ltd v Autocar Equipment Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1996
Date1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Fairstate Ltd v General Enterprise
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 29 November 2010
    ...as incomplete until the formal documentation has been settled and signed”. 7 ( Motemtronic Limited v Autocar Equipment Limited unreported, 20 June 1996, CA) per Aldous LJ; Clipper Maritime Ltd v Shirlstar Container Transport Ltd, The Anemone [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 546 at 556, per Staughton......
  • Associated British Ports v (1) Ferryways Statenv (2) Msc Belgium N.v
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 13 June 2008
    ...is more readily reached in respect of limb (ii). My view that limb (i) is a guarantee is reinforced by the holding of the majority in Motemtronic v Autocar2 that an undertaking to make sure that a company would have the money to meet a contractual obligation was a promise to answer for the ......
  • Associated British Ports v Ferryways NV
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 March 2009
    ...is more readily reached in respect of limb (ii). My view that limb (i) is a guarantee is reinforced by the holding of the majority in Motemtronic v Autocar that an undertaking to make sure that a company would have the money to meet a contractual obligation was a promise to answer for the d......