Mrs. Chamberlains Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Exchequer |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1611 |
| Date | 01 January 1611 |
English Reports Citation: 145 E.R. 346
IN THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER
mes. chamberlains case. In 22 Eliz. York recovered by indictment in the Kings Bench against Allen upon an assumpsit, York being thus interessed of the debt, after that is in May, 26 Eliz. was outlawed upon a mean proces at the suit of J. S. and in the same year and moneth was;outlawed after judgement at the suit of the same J S. and after1 a generall pardon LANE 118. BBCKETS CASE 347 came 27 Eliz. in which pardon, after the pardon of all contempts for outlawrie, there are words also purporting a grant, bounty, and liberality, whereby the Queen granted all monies forfeited, or come unto her hands, by reason of any such outlawry, with other words in the same pardon, and provisoes therein contained, necessary to be observed ; and after in 28 El. York was outlawed again after judgement at the suit of J. S. and tlieii Yorke died, but he lived a full year after the pardon, '27 Eliz. and did not sue any scire facias against the party, at whose suit he was outlawed after judgement ; and after the death of Yorke another pardon came, 29 Eliz. to the same effect with the pardon in 27. And after the Queen grants this debt to Anger for the benefit of Mrs. Chamberlain, who was the wife of Yorke, and Anger sued in the Queens name to have an extent, out of this court against Allen, who was the party against whom judgement was given, and all this was drawn into a case, and delivered to the barons of the Exchequer to consider upon, viz. if execution may bo sued in the Queens name against Allen, and this case was argued at the barre at which I was present; and now it was argued at the bench by Bromley puisne baron, and concluded that Anger may well sue execution in the Queens name, [118] but he had almost made an end of his argument before I came into the Court, and three points seemed to be considered of in the case. Tho 1 was unanimously resolved, and agreed by all the barons, that either of the pardons will advantage Allen, who was debtor to the party outlawed, for although that the words of the pardon, import a pardon of all debts and sums of money accrued to the. Queen by reason of ihc outlawry, yet comparing all the parts of the pardons together, it will plainly appear, that the intent of the pardon was only for the advvntage of him, who had committed the forfeiture by the contempt, and extends only to him by way of restitution ; and another construction would be...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
2747-3174 Québec Inc. v. Quebec (Régie des permis d'alcool), [1996] 3 SCR 919
...Augustus of Hanover, [1957] A.C. 436; Lincoln College's Case (1595), 3 Co. Rep. 58b, 76 E.R.764; Chamberlain's Case (1611), Lane 117, 145 E.R. 346; City of Victoria v. Bishop of Vancouver Island, [1921] 2 A.C. 384; The King v. Assessors of the Town of Sunny Brae, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 76; Lisenko......
-
2747-3174 Québec Inc. v. Régie des permis d'alcool du Québec et autres, (1996) 205 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...consd. [para. 206]. Lincoln College's Case (1595), 3 Co. Rep. 58b; 76 E.R. 764, consd. [para. 206]. Chamberlain's Case (1611), Lane 117; 145 E.R. 346, consd. [para. Victoria (City) v. Bishop of Vancouver Island, [1921] 2 A.C. 384 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 208]. R. v. Assessors of Sunny Brae (......
-
Brissette v. Westbury Life Insurance Co., (1992) 142 N.R. 104 (SCC)
...à l'interprétation d'un contrat d'assurance. On a dit que les règles fondamentales qui devraient s'appliquer étaient les suivantes, à la p. 117 O.R.: [Traduction] "1. La cour devrait vérifier le texte du contrat pour déterminer s'il y a une ambiguïté; "2. la cour devrait vérifier l'intentio......
-
Houde v. Quebec Catholic School Commission, (1977) 17 N.R. 451 (SCC)
...au même titre que le reste, cette assertion va au-delà de la règle. Driedger énonce la vraie règle dans The Construction of Statutes, à la p. 117: [TRADUCTION] "Une annexe ou un appendice fait partie de la Loi, mais quant à savoir d'il fait partie du texte me même, cela dépend du libellé de......
-
Class Actions in Canada: Conflicting Purposes and Unpredictable Outcomes
...si le recours collectif verra le jour, l’autorisation n’établit pas les droits et obligations des parties, qui seront 14 Ibid., à la p. 117. 15 Thompson c. Masson, 1992 CanLII 3662 (QC CA), au paragr. 14 [Thompson]. 16 Pharmascience inc. c. Option Consommateurs, 2005 QCCA 437, au paragr. 21......
-
An Unassailable Right to Speak: Class Communications, Opt-out Rights, and the Class Proceedings Act
...si le recours collectif verra le jour, l’autorisation n’établit pas les droits et obligations des parties, qui seront 14 Ibid., à la p. 117. 15 Thompson c. Masson, 1992 CanLII 3662 (QC CA), au paragr. 14 [Thompson]. 16 Pharmascience inc. c. Option Consommateurs, 2005 QCCA 437, au paragr. 21......
-
Introduction
...si le recours collectif verra le jour, l’autorisation n’établit pas les droits et obligations des parties, qui seront 14 Ibid., à la p. 117. 15 Thompson c. Masson, 1992 CanLII 3662 (QC CA), au paragr. 14 [Thompson]. 16 Pharmascience inc. c. Option Consommateurs, 2005 QCCA 437, au paragr. 21......
-
Who Takes the Reins? Carriage in Canada Over the Last Decade
...si le recours collectif verra le jour, l’autorisation n’établit pas les droits et obligations des parties, qui seront 14 Ibid., à la p. 117. 15 Thompson c. Masson, 1992 CanLII 3662 (QC CA), au paragr. 14 [Thompson]. 16 Pharmascience inc. c. Option Consommateurs, 2005 QCCA 437, au paragr. 21......
-
Huddersfield Corporation Act 1906
...proricled) hc tleeiiied to lie in additioii to aiitl iiot in derogation of any other powers conferred upon thein by -1 ct of Parliament la117 or cnstoni and the Corporation may exercise snch otliei. pov-crs a5 if tliis ,\ct iiatl iiot lieen pn~srd I~i*ovicl~l that 110 pmsoii slid1 iiiciir l......