Muller v Linsley & Mortimer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 30 November 1994 |
| Date | 30 November 1994 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
77 cases
-
Berkeley Square Holdings Ltd & Others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd & Others
...evidence of what one or both of the parties said or wrote. The following are among the most important instances. (1) As Hoffmann LJ noted in Muller's case, when the issue is whether without prejudice communications have resulted in a concluded compromise agreement, those communications are ......
-
Abrikian, Harry, Kolleen Russell & Athol Smith v Arthur Wright & Vera Wright
...for one purpose, or to certain aspects, but not for others. 42 Mrs. Samuels-Brown referred to the case of Muller and Another v. Linsley and Mortimer ( a Firm) December 8, 1994. In that case, in a Judgment lead by Lord Justice Hoffman in the English Court of Appeal (as he then was), it was h......
-
Murrell v Healy
... ... Muller v Linsley & Mortimer (1996) 1 PNLR 74 is the more relevant authority, and the reasoning of Hoffmann ... ...
-
Moorview Developments v First Active Plc
...HIGH HAMILTON 5.3.1984 1984/7/2503 DUFFY v MIN FOR DEFENCE 1979 NI 120 BULA LTD v TARA MINES LTD (NO 5) 1994 1 IR 487 MULLER v LINSLEY 1996 PNLR 74 MCGRATH EVIDENCE 1ED 2005 UNILEVER PLC v PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY 2000 F.S.R. 344 RUSH & TOMKINS v GREATER LONDON COUNCIL & ANOR 1989 AC 1280 ......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Are mediations really without prejudice?
...3Ibid, [10]. 4 Ibid, [14]. 5 Ibid, [16]. 6 Ibid, [19]. 7 Ibid, [21]. 8 Underwood v Cox (1912) 4 DLR 66. 9 Muller v Linsley and Mortimer [1996] PNLR 74. 10Berkeley Square Holdings Ltd v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 551, [30]. 11Ibid, [44]. 12Ibid, [49]. 13 Ibid, [50].......
-
Exceptions To The Without Prejudice Rule: When Can Without Prejudice Communications Be Put Before The English Court?
...of the exception whilst also more closely defining its application. Footnotes 1 [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch) 2 Muller v Linsley & Mortimer [1996] PNLR 74 3 [1989] AC 1280 4 [2000] 1 WLR 2436, at 2444 - 2446; this summary was approved by the Supreme Court in Oceanbulk Shipping SA v TMT Ltd [2010] U......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...(1973), 36 DLR (3d) 95 (BC SC) .................................................................. 199 Muller v Linsley & Mortimer, [1996] PNLR 74 (CA) ........................................ 330 Myers v DPP, [1965] AC 1001 (HL) .....................................................216, 218,......
-
Privileges, Protections, and Immunities
...give access to settlement documentation and correspondence relating 174 Bernardo , above note 153. 175 See Muller v Linsley & Mortimer , [1996] PNLR 74 (CA). 176 Dos Santos v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada , 2005 BCCA 4 at para 21 [ Dos Santos ]. 177 Meyers , above note 152 at para 26. 178......
-
Case Commentaries
...to the same subject-matter (ibid. at [87]). THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 247 CASE COMMENTARIES In Muller v Linsey [1996] PNLR 74, CA and Bradford & Bingley Plc v Rashid [2006] UKHL 37, Lord Hoffmann had attempted to distinguish between an admission (which the ‘without preju......
