Mungoni v Attorney General of Northern Rhodesia

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1960
Year1960
Date1960

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Assa Singh v Mentri Besar, Johore
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Francis George Hill Family Trust v South African Reserve Bank and Others
    • South Africa
    • 30 March 1992
    ...v Minister of Transport Affairs 1988 (1) SA 362 (W) at 372A-C; Mungoni v Attorney-General of Northern Rhodesia [1960] AC 356 ([1960] 1 All ER 446 (PC)) is distinguishable; see, also, Shidiack v Union Government 1912 AD 642. As to the onus of showing that reasonable grounds had existed for a......
  • Huber (J.M.) Corp. v. Alberta (Provincial Treasurer) et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 12 September 1995
    ...v. Harrison, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 238; 8 N.R. 47; 66 D.L.R.(3d) 660, not appld. [para. 26]. Mungoni v. Northern Rhodesia (Attorney General), [1960] A.C. 336 (P.C.), consd. [para. Ahmad v. Public Service Commission Appeal Board (Can.), [1974] 2 F.C. 644; 6 N.R. 287; 51 D.L.R.(3d) 470 (F.C.A.), co......
  • R (National Conservation Council) v Central Planning Authority; Cayman Property Investments Ltd (as Interested Party)
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 23 August 2022
    ...v. Housing & Local Govt. Min., [1970] 1 W.L.R. 1231; [1970] 3 All E.R. 871, considered. (9) Mungoni v. Att. Gen. (Northern Rhodesia), [1960] A.C. 336; [1960] 2 W.L.R. 389; [1960] 1 All E.R. 446, referred to. (10) National Roads Auth. v. Bodden, 2014 (2) CILR 47, referred to. (11) National T......
  • Get Started for Free