Munster v Lamb

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Date1883
Year1883

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • R. v. R.J.S.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 2 February 1995
    ...Wharton for Printing and Publishing Seditious Books, The Trial of (1637), 3 How. State Tr. 1316, refd to. [para. 47]. Lamb v. Munster (1882), 10 Q.B.D. 110, refd to. [para. Bell v. Klein, [1954] 1 D.L.R. 225 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 49]. Brown v. Hooper (1885), 3 Man. R. 86 (Q.B.), refd ......
  • Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 1991
    ...the Queen's Bench in Reg. v. Boyes (1861) 1B. & S. 311, and the words in which I have stated it are those of Stephen J. in Lamb v. Munster (1882) 10 Q.B.D. 110. A party can also claim privilege against discovery of documents on the like ground: see Hunnings v. Williamson (1883) 10 Q.B.D......
  • Re London United Investments Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline)
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 4 February 2000
    ...1, 30-32E); R v WhiteUNK ((1999) 2 SCR 417, 438); Wigmore on Evidence (McNaughton, rev 1961) (volume 8, p318); Lamb v. MunsterELR ((1882) 10 QBD 110, 113). The right not to incriminate oneself presupposed that the prosecution sought to prove their case without resort to evidence obtained th......
  • Get Started for Free