Muskham Finance Ltd v Howard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE ORMEROD,LORD JUSTICE DONOVAN
Judgment Date30 November 1962
Judgment citation (vLex)[1962] EWCA Civ J1130-1
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date30 November 1962
Muskham Finance Limited
and
Howard

[1962] EWCA Civ J1130-1

Before:

Lord Justice Ormerod

Lord Justice Donovan and

Lord Justice Pearson

In The Supreme Court of Judicature

Court of Appeal

Mr Anthony Buck (instructed by Messrs. Blyth, Dutton, Wright & Bennett, Agents for Messrs. King, Metters & Harrison, Cambridge) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Appellant (Second Defendant)

Mr S. Ibbotson (instructed by Messrs. H. Kennard & Son, Leytonstone) appeared as Counsel on behalf of the Respondents (plaintiffs).

Lord Justice Ormerod: I will ask Lord Justice Donovan to read the Judgment of the Court in this matter.

LORD JUSTICE DONOVAN
1

In 1958, Kennerson, the Second Defendant in this case, was in possession of a motor car which he was in process of purchasing from the Plaintiffs on hire-purchase terms. In September, 1959, he still owed £197 under the hire-purchase agreement. In the same month he obtained the permission of the Plaintiffs to sell the car, and entrusted one Turner, a motor car dealer in Cambridge, with the sale. Turner found a buyer for the car, namely, the First Defendant Howard, who, however, also wanted hire-purchase terms, and Turner decided to put this second hire-purchase transaction through the Plaintiffs also. Nothing really turns on the precise mechanics of the transaction, but it was necessary that certain forms should be signed. Turner got Kennerson to sign, first of all, a "Sales Note". This was in form an offer to sell the car to the Plaintiffs for £197 plus a charge of £39 8s. Od. for credit, making £236 8s. Od. in all. Kennerson signed this Sales Note as though he were the dealer, though he did not understand that he was doing so, and simply relied on Turner's representation that this was a document which Kennerson had to sign to enable the sale to take place. No issue arises on this aspect of the case.

2

The Sales Note, together with other documents, were sent by Turner to the Plaintiffs, to enable the new hire-purchase transaction to go forward. One of these documents was a proposal form signed by the proposed new hire-purchaser, Howard. At the bottom of the document was a detachable form headed "Indemnity Form". This was a form intended to be signed by a person willing to act as a surety, and so far as material it reads: "Indemnity Form. To Huskharn Finance Limited…. I, D. T. Kennerson…. request you to enter into the proposed Agreement which is expressed to be between yourselves of the one part and (blank)…. of the other part relating to the supply upon deferred terms of certain goods astherein specified the total purchase price, of which is £197 and in consideration of your so doing I hereby…. undertake and agree with you as follows:- 1. I will upon demand pay to you such sum or sums of money as may at any time or from time to time have become payable by the customer but be unpaid by him. 2. I will indemnify and keep indemnified you your successors and assigns from all loss or damage suffered and all claims costs and expenses made against or incurred by you in any way arising out of or consequent upon your having entered into such Agreement whether arising out of a breach by the customer of any of the terms and conditions thereof or otherwise including any such loss or damage etcetera as aforesaid as may arise from the said Agreement…. 3. No relaxation or indulgence which you may from time to time or at any time extend to the customer shall in any way prejudice or act as a waiver of your strict rights against me hereunder".

3

When these forms reached the Plaintiffs, it was noticed that the Indemnity 7or;ji had not been signed by anybody, and accordingly the Plaintiffs sent it back to Turner. Shortly after this, Turner told Kennerson that he, Turner, had sold the car and said to Kennerson "Gould you sign this paper which is the release note?". It was in fact the form of Indemnity, but Kennerson thought it was a document which would allow him to pass the vehicle to another person, and terminate his, Kennerson's, interest in it. The document was at the time on Turner's untidy desk, which was covered with many papers, and only about the bottom two or three inches of it was showing. The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
49 cases
  • Mercantile Credit Company Ltd v Hamblin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... for loan on security of car - Forms filled in by dealer and presented without authority to finance company as owner's offer - Whether duty of care owed by owner - Whether breach of duty - Whether ... 268D , 280B ) ... Muskham Finance Ltd. v. Howard [ 1963 ] 1 Q.B. 904 ; [ 1963 ] 2 W.L.R. 87 ; [ 1963 ] 1 All ... ...
  • Gallie v Lee
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 February 1969
    ...it was not his document; and he could recover the property from the innocent purchaser, see Muskham Finance v. Howard and Kennesson, (1963, 1 Q.B. 904) at page 913. 1 see no justification for distinguishing those two cases. The man who signs a document without reading it, relying on the adv......
  • Saunders (Executrix of the Estate of Rose Maud Gallie Deceased) v Anglia Building Society (Formerly Known as Northampton Town and County Building Society)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 December 1970
    ...The danger of giving an undue extension to the plea of non est factum has been pointed out in a number of cases. For instance in Muskham Finance Ltd. v. Howard [1963] 1 OB. 904 at page 912 Donovan L.J. delivering the judgment of the Court said:— "The plea of non est factum is a plea which m......
  • OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 November 2011
    ...objectionable terms or terms the legal effect of which they are unaware. As Donovan LJ explained in Muskham Finance Ltd v Howard [ [1963] 1 QB 904 at 912]: Much confusion and uncertainty would result in the field of contract and elsewhere if a man were permitted to try to disown his signatu......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1964 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...v. Lee Conservancy Board (1974) L.R. 9 Ex. 60 168 Martin v. Martin & Co. (1897) 1 Q.B. 429, 432. 223 Muskham Finance Ltd. v. Howard (1963) 2 W.L.R. 87; (1963) 1 C.B. 904; (1963) All E.R. 81. 62 Nana Ofori Atta II v. Nana Abu Bonsra II (1958) A.C. 95, 101 (P.C.) 298 Nana Ofori Atta II and An......