Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1950 |
Date | 1950 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
119 cases
-
Ridge v Baldwin
... ... 726 , C.A. and Hogg v. Scott [ 1947 ] K.B. 759 ; 63 T.L.R. 320 ; [ 1947 ] 1 All E.R. 788 considered ... Nakkuda Ali v. M. F. de S. Jayaratne [ 1951 ] A.C. 66 ; [ 1951 ] T.L.R. (Pt. 2) 214 , P.C. distinguished ... De Verteuil v. Knaggs [ 1918 ] ... ...
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...[1965] 1 Q.B. 57; [1964] 1 All E.R. 717. (31) Nagle v. Feilden, [1966] 2 Q.B. 633; [1966] 1 All E.R. 689. (32) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66, not followed. (33) Osgood v. NelsonELR(1872), L.R. 5 H.L. 636, considered. (34) Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, [19......
- Malayan Breweries (Malaya) Sdn Bhd; Said Dharmalingam bin Abdullah (Formerly known as Dharmalingam a/l Ranganathan)
-
SM Summit Holdings Ltd and Another v Public Prosecutor and another action
...existence of reasonable grounds or reasonable cause as the case may be at the time is an objective one: Nakkuda Ali v MF de S Jayaratne [1951] AC 66; IRC v Rossminster [1980] AC 952. 30.I now address the question of what amounts to reasonable cause to believe or reasonable cause to suspect.......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
-
Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
-
PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
-
Roncarelli's green card: the role of citizenship in Randian constitutionalism.
...3 at 288. (86) Saumur, supra note 3 at 329. (87) Switzman, supra note 3 at 306. (88) R.S.Q. 1941, c. 255. (89) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66 at 78 (90) Roncarelli, supra note 1 at 156. (91) Ibid. at 139-40. (92) Ibid. at 140. (93) Ibid. at 132. (94) Smith & Rhuland, supra not......
-
The public/private distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis.
...Works for the Wandsworth District ((1863), 143 E.R. 414 (Common Pleas)) is paradigmatic in this regard. (141) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66 (142) See Mullan, "Administrative Law", supra note 127 ar 138. (143) Ridge v. Baldwin (1963), [1964] A.C. 40, [1963] 2 W.L.R. 935 (H.L.). (1......
Request a trial to view additional results