Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1950
Date1950
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
119 cases
  • Ridge v Baldwin
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 726 , C.A. and Hogg v. Scott [ 1947 ] K.B. 759 ; 63 T.L.R. 320 ; [ 1947 ] 1 All E.R. 788 considered ... Nakkuda Ali v. M. F. de S. Jayaratne [ 1951 ] A.C. 66 ; [ 1951 ] T.L.R. (Pt. 2) 214 , P.C. distinguished ... De Verteuil v. Knaggs [ 1918 ] ... ...
  • Smith v Police Commissioner
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 8 June 1981
    ...[1965] 1 Q.B. 57; [1964] 1 All E.R. 717. (31) Nagle v. Feilden, [1966] 2 Q.B. 633; [1966] 1 All E.R. 689. (32) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66, not followed. (33) Osgood v. NelsonELR(1872), L.R. 5 H.L. 636, considered. (34) Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, [19......
  • Malayan Breweries (Malaya) Sdn Bhd; Said Dharmalingam bin Abdullah (Formerly known as Dharmalingam a/l Ranganathan)
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • SM Summit Holdings Ltd and Another v Public Prosecutor and another action
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 October 1997
    ...existence of reasonable grounds or reasonable cause as the case may be at the time is an objective one: Nakkuda Ali v MF de S Jayaratne [1951] AC 66; IRC v Rossminster [1980] AC 952. 30.I now address the question of what amounts to reasonable cause to believe or reasonable cause to suspect.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
    • South Africa
    • Fundamina No. , January 2021
    • 17 January 2021
    ...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
  • PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
    • South Africa
    • Fundamina No. , January 2021
    • 17 January 2021
    ...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
  • Roncarelli's green card: the role of citizenship in Randian constitutionalism.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 55 No. 3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...3 at 288. (86) Saumur, supra note 3 at 329. (87) Switzman, supra note 3 at 306. (88) R.S.Q. 1941, c. 255. (89) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66 at 78 (90) Roncarelli, supra note 1 at 156. (91) Ibid. at 139-40. (92) Ibid. at 140. (93) Ibid. at 132. (94) Smith & Rhuland, supra not......
  • The public/private distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 55 No. 3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...Works for the Wandsworth District ((1863), 143 E.R. 414 (Common Pleas)) is paradigmatic in this regard. (141) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66 (142) See Mullan, "Administrative Law", supra note 127 ar 138. (143) Ridge v. Baldwin (1963), [1964] A.C. 40, [1963] 2 W.L.R. 935 (H.L.). (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT