Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1950 |
| Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
133 cases
-
Ridge v Baldwin
... ... 726 , C.A. and Hogg v. Scott [ 1947 ] K.B. 759 ; 63 T.L.R. 320 ; [ 1947 ] 1 All E.R. 788 considered ... Nakkuda Ali v. M. F. de S. Jayaratne [ 1951 ] A.C. 66 ; [ 1951 ] T.L.R. (Pt. 2) 214 , P.C. distinguished ... De Verteuil v. Knaggs [ 1918 ] ... ...
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...[1965] 1 Q.B. 57; [1964] 1 All E.R. 717. (31) Nagle v. Feilden, [1966] 2 Q.B. 633; [1966] 1 All E.R. 689. (32) Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne, [1951] A.C. 66, not followed. (33) Osgood v. NelsonELR(1872), L.R. 5 H.L. 636, considered. (34) Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, [19......
- Melayu Raya Press Ltd v WL Blythe the Colonial Secretary
- Malayan Breweries (Malaya) Sdn Bhd; Said Dharmalingam bin Abdullah (Formerly known as Dharmalingam a/l Ranganathan)
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
-
Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
...one, and he did so from time to time. The most famous instance of his dissent was in the Liversidge Case.” See, too, Bingham 2000: 219.29 [1951] AC 66 (PC) at 76–77.30 [1964] AC 40 (HL) at 73.31 [1972] 2 QB 455 (CA) at 510D–E.32 [1980] AC 952 (HL) at 1011D–E.33 The reasons for Liversidge’s ......
-
Natural Justice and Disciplinary Cases in Britain and France
...Liyanagev. R., [1967] IAC 259 Local Government Board v. Arlidge, [1915] AC 120 Nagle v. Fielden, [1966] 2 QB 633 NakkudaAliv. Jayaratne, [1951] AC66 Padfield v. Minister of Agriculture, [1968] AC 997 Race Relations Board v. Haigh, The Times, 11 September 1969; (1969) 119 New Law Journal 858......
-
SCOPE OF THE ORDER OF CERTIORARI
...ground, Lord Radcliffe in delivering the opinion of their Lordships of the Privy Council in the case of Nakkuda Ali v. Jayaratne (1951) A.C. 66, said: - "Their Lordships have come to the conclusion that certiorari does not lie in this case. It would not be helpful to reconsider the immense ......
