Napier v National Business Agency Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1951 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
-
Red Sail Frozen Foods Ltd ((in Receivership))Red Sail Kilmore Ltd ((in Receivership)) and Red Sail Exports Ltd ((in Receivership)) Tom Grace
...of that, he referred the decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Napier v. National Business Agency Limited [1951] 2 All E.R. 264, stating that the facts in that case were almost identical to the facts in the case under consideration by him. He quoted the following passage f......
-
21st Century Logistic Solutions Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Madysen Ltd
...also "expenses" that included the income tax payable on the salary was against public policy and therefore unenforceable. In Napier v National Business Agency Ltd [1951] 2 All E.R. 264 the Court of Appeal took the same approach. Here, the plaintiff sought to sue for wrongful dismissal on a ......
-
Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd v Lucky Red Investments Ltd
...object of defrauding the revenue authority, ie, Miller v Karlinski (1945) 62 TLR 85 (“Miller”), Napier v National Business Agency, Ltd [1951] 2 All ER 264 (“Napier”) and Alexander v Rayson [1936] 1 KB 169 (“Alexander”). However, in none of these cases, which we will now examine, was the sub......
-
Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd v Lucky Red Investments Ltd (by counterclaim)
...inventory. This removed the present case from the likes of Miller v Karlinski [1945] 62 TLR 85, Napier v National Business Agency Ltd [1951] 2 All ER 264 and Alexander v Rayson [1936] 1 KB 169, where the schemes were clearly calculated to deceive the revenue authorities and served no other ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Illegality
...v Johnson (1913), 5 WWR 117 (BCSC). 14 [1936] 1 KB 169 (CA) [ Alexander v Rayson ]. See also Napier v National Business Agency Ltd , [1951] 2 All ER 264 (CA) (employment contract — income tax) [ Napier ]; Stuart v Kingman (1978), 91 DLR (3d) 142 (Ont HCJ) (land transfer tax); Tucker Estate ......
-
Illegal conduct and employment rights - a matter of contract
..."Illegality and the Enforcement of Employment Rights", (1992) 36 Journal o f Business Law 516. Napier v. National Business Agency [1951] 2 All E.R. 264. [1988] 2 All E.R. 23 at 29. Case Note 203 would the applicant be prevented from enforcing his claim where the defendant’s part in the affa......