Napp Pharmaceutical Group Ltd v Asta Medica Ltd and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Magnesium Elektron Ltd v Molycorp Chemicals & Oxides (Europe) Ltd and Another
...the judgment of Waller LJ in Canada Trust v Stolzenberg (No 2) [1998] 1 WLR 547 (CA). He also noted the observations made by Laddie J in Napp v Asta [1999] FSR 370 about the particular considerations raised by reliance on a claim of joint tortfeasance as the basis for bringing a foreign def......
- Sepracor Inc. v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd and Others
-
Football Dataco Ltd and Others v Sportradar Gmbh (a Company Registered in Germany) and Another
...made out that the joint tortfeasor has really become involved in some way with the tort which is the subject of the action— Napp v Astra [1999] FSR 370. 39 In the light of those principles Mr Cuddigan submitted that the fact that the Defendants’ website bore a copyright notice with the name......
-
Bradley Lomas Electrolok Ltd and Another v Colt Ventilation East Asia Pte Ltd and Others
...Multiple Packaging Division of Riverwood International Corp [1997] FSR 484 (folld) Napp Pharmaceutical Group Ltd v Asta Medica Ltd [1999] FSR 370 (refd) Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1994] 1 AC 438; [1993] 4 All ER 456 (folld) Unilever plc v Chefaro Proprietari......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...(UK) Ltd[1999] Ch 33, Aubrey Max Sandman v Panasonic UK Limited[1998] FSR 651 and Napp Pharmaceutical Group Ltd v Asta Medica Ltd[1999] FSR 370 were decided only on the “good arguable case” standard. Bradley Lomas makes it clear that if there is a good arguable case that the requirements of......