Nash v Layton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • Aw Chen; Johannes Koplan
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Arab Malaysian Finance Bhd v Meridien International Credit Corporation Ltd London
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Money Markets v Fanning (& Others)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 February 2000
    ...Finlay C.J. (page 297): this is an additional factor which should be taken into account on the present application. 62 2. Nash -v- Layton [1911] 2 CH 71, establishes the principle that interrogatories are permissible in relation to facts in dispute and are excluded only where they relate to......
  • United Dominions Trust Ltd v Kirkwood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 24 February 1966
    ...a moneylender unless he can bring himself within one of the specified exceptions. It was so construed by Lord Justice Fletcher Noulton in Nash v. Layton, 1911, 2 Chancery at p. 79, who said that a Judge would have to direct the jury that "they must find he is a moneylender unless he came wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT