National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1986
Date1986
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • British Airline Pilots Association v JET2.com Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 January 2017
    ...of this line of cases (which is the source also of the phrase "apt for incorporation") is the decision of Scott J in National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers [1986] Ch 736. But Mr Bowers relied in particular on the decision of this Court in Malone v British Airways plc [2010] EWC......
  • SCA Packaging Ltd v HM Customs & Excise
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 22 February 2007
    ... ... ”) were chargeable to income tax and National Insurance Contributions (“NIC”) as being ... ...
  • Malone and Others v British Airways Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 November 2010
    ...it would not be apt for incorporation. This delineation was based largely on the words of Scott J, as he then was, in National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers [1986] ICR 736, [1986] IRLR 439 and those of Keene LJ in Kaur v Rover Group Limited [2005] IRLR 40. In the National Coal......
  • Kulvinder Kaur and MG Rover Group Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 November 2004
    ...to legally-enforceable contractual rights between the employer and the individual employee. As Scott J indicated in National Coal Board v. National Union of Mineworkers [1986] IRLR 439, such collective agreements may deal with the appropriate mechanisms for dealing with industrial disputes ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Staffing Arrangements Not Incorporated Into Individual Contracts
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 1 August 2011
    ...that they were not but in so concluding it rejected the reasons given by the Trial Judge (Butterworth J). Referring to NCB v NUM [1986] IRLR 439 and Kaur v Rover Group Limited [2005] IRLR 40 the Court recognised that it had to distinguish between those terms "which are of their nature apt t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT