National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1965 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1965 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
205 cases
-
Gurasz v Gurasz
... ... Those cases were clearly in Lord Hodson's mind in National Provincial Bank v. Ainsworth, (1965 A.C. 1260), when he ... ...
-
Pettitt v Pettitt
...almost necessarily follows". There will be some cases in which, as Lord Upjohn said in National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth [1965] A.C. 1175, 1236m, an equitable knife must be used to sever the Gordian 40The case of Jones v. Maynard [1951] 1 Ch. 572 (which was an action between forme......
- Daniel v State of Western Australia
- Australian Capital Territory v Pinter
Get Started for Free
14 firm's commentaries
-
From Cryptic To (some) Clarity: English Law And Policy Rising To The Challenge Of Cryptoassets (Part 1)
...They meet the four criteria set out in Lord Wilberforce's classic definition of property in National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 as being definable, identifiable by third parties, and having some degree of permanence.7 That too was the conclusion of the Singapore Internationa......
-
Are cryptocurrencies considered property for legal purposes?
...capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability (National Province Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175). Contract Issues - The parties' positions B2C2 decided to commence legal proceedings against Quoine in May 2017, alleging that Quoine had......
-
Crypto-Assets As Property: Cayman Litigators' Tools To Assist In Their Tracing And Recovery
...assets meet the four criteria of the classic definition of property set out by Lord Wilberforce in National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] 1 AC 1175 as being definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in their nature of assumption by third parties, and having some degree of Impor......
-
Crypto Law In Malaysia
...on the NFTs by the lender if the specified payment was not made by the stipulated date 12. National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 13. 14. ibid 15. ibid 16. ibid 17. ibid The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist adv......
Get Started for Free
15 books & journal articles
-
Native title and the 'acquisition of property' under the Australian constitution.
...Commonwealth (1993) 176 CLR 480, 528 (Dawson and Toohey JJ). (85) (1999) 201 CLR 351, 388. (86) National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248 (Lord (87) Those who benefited from the free advertising time during election periods in Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Comm......
-
Estoppel in land law
...to reside on the land until the money is paid (cf Re Sharpe [1980] 1 W.L.R. 219). 43 Though National Provincial Bank Ltd. Ainsworth [1965] A.C. 1175 shows that a right to an equitable remedy does not normally bind purchasers (see Gray, Elements of Land Law, p. 422), estoppel may be regarded......
-
Table of Cases
...80 (CA) ...............................................................................241, 243 National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth, [1965] AC 1175 (HL) .................... 256 National Trust Co v Palace Theatre Ltd, [1928] 2 DLR 739, [1928] 1 WWR 805 (Alta CA) .............................
-
Competing Rights
...so the purchasers acquired legal title to those rights when the transfer was registered. 68 National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth , [1965] AC 1175 (HL). 69 Phillips v Phillips (1862), 4 De GF & J 208, 45 ER 1164. 70 [1975] 2 SCR 715, 50 DLR (3d) 265 at 277. 71 PJ Millett, “Restitution an......
Get Started for Free