National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
174 cases
-
Pettitt v Pettitt
...almost necessarily follows". There will be some cases in which, as Lord Upjohn said in National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth [1965] A.C. 1175, 1236m, an equitable knife must be used to sever the Gordian 40The case of Jones v. Maynard [1951] 1 Ch. 572 (which was an action between ......
- Australian Capital Territory v Pinter
- Daniel v State of Western Australia
- Gurasz v Gurasz
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Solving the crypto-crossword: UK developments in the legal and regulatory treatment of cryptoassets
...Statement by Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court (p. 3) 3 Legal Statement, paragraph 60 4 National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 5 Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins [2013] EWCA Civ 886 Solving the Crypto-Crossword | 2020 © Allen & Overy LLP 2020 3 In relation ......
-
Solving the Crypto-Crossword
...Statement by Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court (p. 3) Legal Statement, paragraph 60 National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins [2013] EWCA Civ 886 Robertson v Persons Unknown, unreported, CL-2019-000444 and Elena Vorotyntseva v Mone......
-
UKJT Legal Statement On Cryptoassets And Smart Contracts Aims To Give Market Confidence That England & Wales Is A Crypto-Friendly Jurisdiction
...they analyse how each of those criterion could apply to a cryptoasset. The authors reference National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth H/L [1965] A.C. 1175 where it was said by Lord Wilberforce that before rights or interests can be admitted in property, those rights or interests must be definab......
-
Are cryptocurrencies considered property for legal purposes?
...capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability (National Province Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175). Contract Issues - The parties' positions B2C2 decided to commence legal proceedings against Quoine in May 2017, alleging that Quoine had......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Native title and the 'acquisition of property' under the Australian constitution.
...Commonwealth (1993) 176 CLR 480, 528 (Dawson and Toohey JJ). (85) (1999) 201 CLR 351, 388. (86) National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248 (Lord (87) Those who benefited from the free advertising time during election periods in Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Comm......
-
Compensation for Banned Handguns: Indemnifying ‘Old Property’
...Right’ in D. Cornell etal (eds), Hegel and Legal Theory (New York: Routledge, 1991) 205, 209.26 National Provincial Bank Ltd vAinsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248–1249 (emphasis added).27 K. Gray, Elements of Land Law (Butterworth: London, 2nd ed, 1993) 282–311, 645–672.28 Patents Act 1977 s 25 (......
-
Acquiring Property Rights from Uncompleted Sales of Lane
...1(2)(a) as ‘any description of trust (whether express, implied, resulting orconstructive)’.20 See, eg National Provincial Bank vAinsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248.21 See Kevin Gray, Elements of Land Law (London: Butterworths, 2nd ed, 1993) 901. He notes ‘such alicence enjoys the perpetually bin......
-
IS A CAUSE OF ACTION A CASTLE? STATUTORY CHOSES IN ACTION AS PROPERTY AND S 51 (XXXI) OF THE CONSTITUTION.
...265, 291. (74) Dalziel (n 60) 295 (McTiernan J). (75) Ibid 290. (76) (1948) 76 CLR 1, 349 (Dixon J) ('Bank Nationalisation Case'). (77) [1965] AC 1175 (78) See, eg, R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327, 342 (Mason J) ('Meneling'); ICM (n 35) 218 [197] (Heydon J);......
Request a trial to view additional results