National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
174 cases
  • Pettitt v Pettitt
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 April 1969
    ...almost necessarily follows". There will be some cases in which, as Lord Upjohn said in National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth [1965] A.C. 1175, 1236m, an equitable knife must be used to sever the Gordian 40The case of Jones v. Maynard [1951] 1 Ch. 572 (which was an action between ......
  • Australian Capital Territory v Pinter
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Daniel v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Gurasz v Gurasz
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 July 1969
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • Solving the crypto-crossword: UK developments in the legal and regulatory treatment of cryptoassets
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 2 March 2020
    ...Statement by Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court (p. 3) 3 Legal Statement, paragraph 60 4 National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 5 Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins [2013] EWCA Civ 886 Solving the Crypto-Crossword | 2020 © Allen & Overy LLP 2020 3 In relation ......
  • Solving the Crypto-Crossword
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 25 February 2020
    ...Statement by Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court (p. 3) Legal Statement, paragraph 60 National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins [2013] EWCA Civ 886 Robertson v Persons Unknown, unreported, CL-2019-000444 and Elena Vorotyntseva v Mone......
  • UKJT Legal Statement On Cryptoassets And Smart Contracts Aims To Give Market Confidence That England & Wales Is A Crypto-Friendly Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 18 December 2019
    ...they analyse how each of those criterion could apply to a cryptoasset. The authors reference National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth H/L [1965] A.C. 1175 where it was said by Lord Wilberforce that before rights or interests can be admitted in property, those rights or interests must be definab......
  • Are cryptocurrencies considered property for legal purposes?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 August 2019
    ...capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability (National Province Bank v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175). Contract Issues - The parties' positions B2C2 decided to commence legal proceedings against Quoine in May 2017, alleging that Quoine had......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Native title and the 'acquisition of property' under the Australian constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 Nbr. 1, April - April 2004
    • 1 April 2004
    ...Commonwealth (1993) 176 CLR 480, 528 (Dawson and Toohey JJ). (85) (1999) 201 CLR 351, 388. (86) National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248 (Lord (87) Those who benefited from the free advertising time during election periods in Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Comm......
  • Compensation for Banned Handguns: Indemnifying ‘Old Property’
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 61-2, March 1998
    • 1 March 1998
    ...Right’ in D. Cornell etal (eds), Hegel and Legal Theory (New York: Routledge, 1991) 205, 209.26 National Provincial Bank Ltd vAinsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248–1249 (emphasis added).27 K. Gray, Elements of Land Law (Butterworth: London, 2nd ed, 1993) 282–311, 645–672.28 Patents Act 1977 s 25 (......
  • Acquiring Property Rights from Uncompleted Sales of Lane
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 61-4, July 1998
    • 1 July 1998
    ...1(2)(a) as ‘any description of trust (whether express, implied, resulting orconstructive)’.20 See, eg National Provincial Bank vAinsworth [1965] AC 1175, 1248.21 See Kevin Gray, Elements of Land Law (London: Butterworths, 2nd ed, 1993) 901. He notes ‘such alicence enjoys the perpetually bin......
  • IS A CAUSE OF ACTION A CASTLE? STATUTORY CHOSES IN ACTION AS PROPERTY AND S 51 (XXXI) OF THE CONSTITUTION.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 Nbr. 1, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...265, 291. (74) Dalziel (n 60) 295 (McTiernan J). (75) Ibid 290. (76) (1948) 76 CLR 1, 349 (Dixon J) ('Bank Nationalisation Case'). (77) [1965] AC 1175 (78) See, eg, R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327, 342 (Mason J) ('Meneling'); ICM (n 35) 218 [197] (Heydon J);......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT