National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v Midlands Electricity Board

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1952
Year1952
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • New Providence Development Company Ltd v Windsor Field Development Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 21 July 2023
    ...because it is “impossible of apprehension or construction” (to adopt Vaisey J's words in National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v Midlands Electricity Board [1952] 1 All ER 298). While the true meaning of Clause 19(2) is a matter for me, the burden of proving the ......
  • Wrotham Park Estate Company Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...[1902] 2 K.B. 574, C.A. Lowe v. Partridge (unreported), July 11, 1973. National Trust v. Midlands Electricity Board [1952] Ch. 380; [1952] 1 All E.R. 298. Newton Abbot Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Williamson & Treadgold Ltd. [1952] Ch. 286; [1952] 1 All E.R. Oriental Steamship Co. v. Ty......
  • Bridlington Relay Ltd v Yorkshire Electricity Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...916, C.A. F4[1914] 3 K.B. 772; 30 T.L.R. 441, C.A. F5(1894) 70 L.T. 547; 10 T.L.R. 259, C.A. F6[1952] Ch. 380; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 74; [1952] 1 All E.R. 298. F7[1902] A.C. 381, F8(1889) 41 Ch.D. 88, P.C. F9Ibid. 94. F10(1851) 4 De G. & Sm. 315, 322. F1141 Ch.D. 88. F12(1948) 198 P. 2d 847. ......
  • Podwin et al. v. Gondziola, 2004 SKQB 225
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 21 May 2004
    ...Sask.R. 232 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 20]. National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v. Midlands Electricity Board, [1952] Ch. 380, refd to. [para. Newco Investments Corp. v. British Columbia Transit (1987), 14 B.C.L.R.(2d) 212 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22]. Stenmark v. W......
  • Get Started for Free