Neill v Devonshire (Duke of)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- Kong Ming Bank Bhd v Leong Ho Yuen
-
Johnston v O'Neill
...App. Cas. 641. (3) [1891] 2 Ch. 678. (1) 12 CI & F. 641. (2) I. R. 10 C. L. 398, 422. (1) I. R. 8 C. L. 68. (1) I. R. 10 C. L. 398. (2) 8 App. Cas. 135. (3) 1 Camp. (4) 4 App. Cas. 770. (5) 2 Ridg. 267. (6) I. R. 2 C. L. 324, 501. (1) 3 App. Cas. 641, at p. 667. (1) 3 App. Cas. 641. (1) 17 ......
-
Little and Others v Cooper and Others
...the fishery had in fact been put in defence prior to Magna Charta. Malcomsonv. O'DeaENR, 10 H. L. C. 593; Neill v. Duke of DevonshireELR 8 App. Cas. 135; and Moore v. Attorney-General,IR [1934] I. R. 44, applied. Date of the application of MagnaCharta to Ireland discussed. I.F.S.] Little an......
-
Barlow v Minister for Agriculture
... ... only shortly after the famous visit by Taoiseach Seán Lemass to Prime Minister Terence O'Neill in January 1965, which in the words of one commentator ended "a sterile cold war" between the two ... Duke of Devonshire [1882] 8 App. Cas. 135 ... That was a case which involved a challenge to fishing ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
General Words
...Granville 41 ER 498, (1841) Cr & Ph 283. 30 Bruce v Helliwell (1860) 5 H & N 609, 157 ER 1323. 31 Neill v Duke of Devonshire (1882–83) LR 8 App Cas 135. 32 For example, Borell v Dann (1843) 2 Hare 440, 67 ER 181. See also 27.2 as to annual services. 172 The Law of the Manor determine the va......
-
Table of Cases
...71 LJ Ch 378, CA 6.6 Neeld v Hendon Urban District Council (1899) 81 LT 405, 63 JP 724, CA 6.5 Neill v Duke of Devonshire (1882–83) LR 8 App Cas 135, 31 WR 622, HL 9.5, 12.4 Nevil’s Case, Sir Henry (Goodchrome v Moor) (1613) 11 Co Rep 17a, 77 ER 1166 5.5, 8.1, 22.7 New Windsor Corporation v......