Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Generics (UK) Ltd (T/A Viatris)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Ian Karet |
| Judgment Date | 29 October 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] EWHC 2897 (Pat) |
| Docket Number | Case No: HP-2021-000021 |
| Year | 2021 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 firm's commentaries
-
Neurim v Mylan: A Most Unusual Case - Take Two Part Two
...(particularly considering the most unusual circumstances of the proceedings more generally) the application was refused, see here [2021] EWHC 2897 (Pat). The court applied the approach set out in IPCom v HTC ([2013] EWCA Civ 1496) and, given the timing of patent expiry (August 2022) and the......
-
Neurim v Mylan: A Most Unusual Case - Take Two Part Two
...(particularly considering the most unusual circumstances of the proceedings more generally) the application was refused, see here [2021] EWHC 2897 (Pat). The court applied the approach set out in IPCom v HTC ([2013] EWCA Civ 1496) and, given the timing of patent expiry (August 2022) and the......