Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong and Another
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Neutral Citation | UKEAT/69/09 |
Date | 2010 |
Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong and Another
...decision having been made on 22 December 2003 and upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal. At paragraph 129 of Armstrong & Ors v Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Hospital Trust [2005] EWCA Civ 1608 the remittal to the employment tribunal provided a question, that if the answer to the third question......
-
Doreen McNeil and Others v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...para. 113 of his judgment (pp. 502–3). (See also my judgment in Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong [2010] UKEAT 0069/09, [2010] ICR 674, at para. 2 This aspect is more fully discussed in para. 15 of my judgment in Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Hamilton [2011] UKEAT 04......
-
Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice
... ... "A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A ... with the decision of this Court in Armstrong v Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust [2005] ... ...
- Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan and Others (No 1)
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...1957, Re [1962] 1 WLR 1347, [1962] 3 All ER 751, 106 SJ 902, RPC 140 Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong [2010] ICR 674, [2010] All ER (D) 215 (Mar), EAT 83 Nixon v Attorney General [1931] AC 184, 100 LJ Ch 70, 144 LT 249, HL 179, 184 Obasa v United Kingdom (Applic......
-
Writing Judgments, Decisions and Awards
...and I had occasion to criticise a similar approach in another EAT case – see Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust v Armstrong [2010] ICR 674, at para. 46 (pp. 695-6). But I have never before seen a case where the entirety of a judgment has been based on one side’s submissions in the way ......