Nicholas Hubberd port ejectione firmae v John Spencer en que le Case fuit que
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Year | 1664 |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 348
DEL COMMON-BANK
Nicholas Hubberd port ejectione firmæ
and
ers John Spencer en que le Case fuit que
CXXV. Nicholas Hubberd port ejectione firmm vers John Spencer en que le Case fuit que Francis Clopton seiai del Manner de Sampford 1558. fist son testament en escript & devise le Maunor a son femme durant 30. ana in ceux parols, scilicet, for and to these intents and purposes following, scilicet, I will and my ininde and intent is, que le dit Bridgt ma. femrae durant le dit terme annuelrnent contenter & payer hors de les...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
45 cases
-
MacLeod v MacLeod
...in June 2006 with judgment in October. The wife claimed full financial provision, which she put at 30% of the husband's wealth at marriage and 50% of its increase in value during the marriage. She asserted that the agreements should be disregarded altogether. The husband claimed that the th......
-
Floor v Davis
...in issue. Thus the taxpayer did not control the company. 9 2. A foreign company called "Donmarco" became entitled to 100 preferred shares and 50 ordinary shares in F.N.W. The ordinary shares also carried one vote each, and conferred superior rights as to return of capital in a winding up. 1......
-
Taylor v Provan
...1963 he acquired residential status and in 1965 a residence in the Bahamas. On the yearly average he spent between 100 and 150 days in Canada and 50 to 85 days in the United Kingdom and the remainder in the Bahamas. 52 The subject-matter of the assessments was Mr. Taylor's travelling expens......
-
Max John Beckham v R
...was adequately remedied by the grant of bail. 170 Mr Mount said that there was a case for a reduction in sentence of between 30 per cent and 50 per cent in this case. He cited five factors in support of that submission. We evaluate each in turn. (a) The seriousness of the breaches of the Bi......
Get Started for Free