Nichols v Evens

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1882
Year1882
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • McCambridge Ltd v Joseph Brennan Bakeries
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 Diciembre 2013
    ...capable of making informed decision on acceptance of lodgment - Whether defendant to be permitted to make lodgment - Nichols v Evens (1883) 22 Ch D 611 approved - Dome Telecom Ltd v Eircom Ltd [2007] IESC 59; [2008] 2 IR 726; Ely v Dargan [1967] IR 89; Hollister v Medik [2012] EWCA Civ 141......
  • Campbell v M'Clelland
    • Ireland
    • Common Pleas Division (Ireland)
    • 16 Abril 1886
    ...HannonUNK 10 L. R. Ir. 17. Wheeler v. The United Telephone Co.ELR 13 Q. B. D. 597. Goutard v. Carr Ibid. 598, note. Nichols v. EvansELR 22 Ch. D. 611. M' Ilwraith v. GreenELR 14 Q. B. D. 766. Kelly v. SlaterUNK 7 Ir. C. L. R. 56. 448 LAW REPORTS (IRELAND). [L. R. 1. Ex. Div. of Court, and c......
  • Malhotra v Dhawan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Associated Engineers Ltd. v Lo Chee Pui
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 27 Febrero 2003
    ...of Order 22 rule 1 that it only applies to actions for a debt and damages and not to other claims, see, for example, Nichols v. Evens (1883) 22 Ch D 611. This Order, however, also applies to actions where debts and damages are sought together with other relief, for example, injunction, see ......