Noone against Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 26 April 1790 |
| Date | 26 April 1790 |
English Reports Citation: 126 E.R. 217
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Noone against Smith
[369] cases argued and determined in the court of ^common pleas in easter tehm, in the thirtieth year of the reign of george III. noone against smith. Monday, April 26th, 1790. A plea of tender may be pleaded, after a Judge's order for time to plead has been obtained. A rule having been granted on the motion of Watson, Serjt., to shew cause why the defendant should not plead several matters, viz. non assumpsit as to part, tender as to the residue, and a set-off, Eooke, Serjt. shewed for cause, that the defendant had obtained four several orders of a Judge, for time to plead, between the 9th of February last and the 9th of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
33 cases
-
Bonne Fortune Beleggings Bpk v Kalahari Salt Works (Pty) Ltd en Andere
...(Africa) Ltd. and Another, 1968 (3) S.A. 98 op bl. 101; Kgobane and Another v. Minister of Justice A and Another, 1969 (3) S.A. 365 op bl. 369) met eerbied beklemtoon en daarop wys dat hierdie geding reeds twee aansoeke om kondonasie geverg bet wat klaarblyklik vermy kon gewees bet deur sle......
-
Oost en Andere v Reek en Snideman, NNO en Andere
...Quaest. 25, art. 4, nrs. 43, 57 - 9; Kemsley & Others v Kemsley & Others, supra te bl. 524; Estate Smith v Estate Follett, supra te bl. 369 - 71, 387 - E. G. Hoexter, S.C. (bygestaan deur F. H. Grosskopf), namens die eerste en tweede verweerders. H I. W. B. de Villiers, namens die vyf-en-tw......
-
S v Wandrag
...nie. Die vermoede sou alleen moes berus op R v Rieback and Another, supra, waarin Attorney-General v Grieve nagevolg is en MILLIN, R., op bl. 369, hom as volg daaroor H 'We are bound by it unless we can clearly perceive that it is wrong. This was not argued; and, speaking for myself, while ......
-
S v Loubser
...sou las om na die ontbinding van die huwelik onderhoud aan die onskuldige te betaal (sien Hahlo, S. A. Law of Husband and Wife, 1ste uitg., bl. 369 - 371; 2de uitg., bl. 15, 428; Sadie v Sadie, 1953 (4) SA 39 (W) op bl. 40). Die oorwig van mening, na die uitspraak in G Schultz v Schultz, 19......
Get Started for Free