Norris v Government of the United States of America (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD PHILLIPS,LORD HOPE,LORD BROWN,LORD MANCE,LORD COLLINS,LORD KERR
Judgment Date24 February 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] UKSC 9
CourtSupreme Court
Date24 February 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
480 cases
  • McIntyre v Government of the United States of America
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 June 2014
    ...Article 8 rights. There is nothing in this case approaching what is required by the decisions in Norris v Government of the USA (No 2) [2010] 2 AC 487, [2010] UKSC 9 and HH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa [2012] UKSC 25, [2013] 1 AC 338. Observation: The importance of com......
  • Douglas Belbin v The Regional Court of Lille, France
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 January 2015
    ...of its findings of fact and by applying the well-established law as set out in the two Supreme Court decisions of Norris v. USA (No.2) [2010] UKSC 9 [2010] 2 AC 487 and HH v. Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa [2012] UKSC 25 [2013] 1 AC 338. Once again, these decisions are so ......
  • Paul Dunham and Another v Government of the United States
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 19 February 2014
    ...that the legal principles which apply on this appeal are to be derived from two decisions of the Supreme Court: Norris v. USA (No.2) [2010] UKSC 9 [2010] 2 AC 487 and HH v. Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa [2012] UKSC 25 [2013] 1 AC 338, in which the Supreme Court considered......
  • Douglas Belbin v The Regional Court of Lille, France
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 January 2015
    ...of its findings of fact and by applying the well-established law as set out in the two Supreme Court decisions of Norris v. USA (No.2) [2010] UKSC 9 [2010] 2 AC 487 and HH v. Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa [2012] UKSC 25 [2013] 1 AC 338. Once again, these decisions are so ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Competition Laws Outside the United States. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 2 February 2020
    ...that the person’s conduct as a director makes him unfit to be concerned in the management of a company. 358 351. Norris v. United States [2010] UKSC 9. 352. More information is available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/first-ever-extradition-antitrust-charge. 353. EA § 204 introduces five......
  • Immigration Defense Waivers in Federal Criminal Plea Agreements
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 69-3, March 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...interpreted the convention. See, e.g., A (FC) et al. v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't (2004) UKHL 56; Norris v. Gov't of the U.S. (2010) UKSC 9 (appeal taken from [2009] EWHC 995 (Admin)) (UKHL); Att'y Gen. v. Zaoui et al. [2005] NZSC 38 at [16]. 291. UN Committee Against Torture, Draft......
  • When is a Courier Not a ‘Mule’?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-6, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...R (S) 61. 10 R v Valentas and Tabuns [2010] 2 Cr App R (S) 73.11 [2011] 2 AC 166.12 [2011] EWHC 1145 (Admin) at [60]–[63].13 Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9.14 [2012] EWCA Crim When Is a Courier Not a ‘Mule’? Laws LJ referred in R (on the application of HH) v Westminster City Magis-trates’ Court......
  • The Forum Bar in UK Extradition Law: An Unnecessary Failure
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 84-2, April 2020
    • 1 April 2020
    ...Accordingly it differs from the unilateral exercise of deportation, where there are distinct public policy considerations. In NorrisvUK[2010] UKSC 9, Lord Phillips said that while it is not unreasonable that deportation and extradition are often not dis-tinguished, the ‘ ...public interest ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT