North British and Mercantile Insurance Company v London, Liverpool, and Globe Insurance Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
China Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (formerly known as Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd)
...English Court of Appeal decision of North British and Mercantile Insurance Company v London, Liverpool, and Globe Insurance Company (1876) 5 Ch D 569. 15 It bears mentioning at this juncture that counsel for both parties accepted the fact that there was no “non-contribution clause” involved......
-
Caledonia North Sea Ltd v London Bridge Engineering Ltd
...which it was part make it plain that primary liability was to fall on the contractor, just as in North British and Mercantile Insurance Company v London Liverpool and Globe Insurance Company (1877) 5 Ch D 569, on very different facts, it was held that the loss should be borne by the wharfin......
-
Commercial Union Assurance Company Ltd v Hayden
...liability basis was applied, or even discussed. Now I come to two English cases where it was adopted. The first is North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. v. London, Liverpool and Globe Insurance Co., (1877) 5 Chancery Division, 569, which came before Sir George Jessel, Master of the Rol......
-
Chris O'kane (for and on Behalf of Himself, Syndicate 2020 and all Other and Another v Jonathan Jones (for and on Behalf of Himself, Syndicate 329 and all Other Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Policy No. Aa111350t) and Others
...170 Paragraph 23.9 refers to the case of North British and Mercantile Insurance Co v London, Liverpool and Globe Insurance Co (1877) 5 Ch D 569, on which Jones relied. The facts, and the decision of the Court of Appeal, are for present purposes sufficiently summarised in that paragraph, as ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...203 North British and Mercantile Insurance Co v Liverpool, London, and Globe Insurance Co (1877), 5 Ch D 569 (CA)..............................545, 547 North Lethbridge Garage Ltd v Continental Casualty Co, [1930] 2 DLR 835, [1930] 1 WWR 491, [1930] AJ No 39 (SCAD) .............. 328 Table ......
-
Rights of relief, subrogation and unjustified enrichment in Scots law
...Esso Petroleum Co Ltd 1987 SLT 345 OH. 18 Nor th British and Mercantile Insurance Co v London, Liverpool and Globe Insurance Co (1877) L.R. 5 Ch D 569; Scholeeld Goodman & Sons Ltd v Zyngier [1986] AC 562; [1985] 3 WLR 953; Speno Rail Maintenance Australia Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd ......
-
Excess “Other Insurance” Clauses: to Contribute or Subrogate?
...141 Merkin La w of Insurance 410. See al so North British and Mercantile In surance Co v Lon don, Liverpool and Globe Insu rance Co. (1877) 5 ChD 569, where the ab sence of double insu rance was seen as pr eclud-ing the applica tion of rateable propor tion clauses.142 See Eva ns v Marit ime......
-
Overlapping Coverage
...caused to the grain; the policy issued by Rodocanachi’s insurer covered the proprietary interests of the owner of the grain. In these 4 (1877), 5 Ch D 569 (CA) [ North British ]. INSUR ANCE LAW 546 circumstances, “[o]ne company has no equity against the other.” 5 To the extent that Rodocana......
Request a trial to view additional results