North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Company, Ltd, v Manchester Brewery Company, Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date13 December 1898
Judgment citation (vLex)[1898] UKHL J1213-2
CourtHouse of Lords
Date13 December 1898

[1898] UKHL J1213-2

House of Lords

North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Company, Limited,
and
Manchester Brewery Company, Limited.
1

After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well yesterday as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of the North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Company, Limited, of Macclesfield, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 20th of April 1898, so far as therein stated to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order, so far as aforesaid, might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Manchester Brewery Company, Limited, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondents, but not being called on; And due consideration being had of what was offered for the said Appellants:

2

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 20th of April 1898, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed; and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Cantlie v. Canadian Heating Products Inc., 2017 BCSC 286
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 22 February 2017
    ...to have originated in the House of Lords over a century ago in North Cheshire & Manchester Brewery v. Manchester Brewery Co. (1898), [1899] A.C. 83 (U.K. H.L.), has "now been regarded as having been virtually abandoned or rejected" (per: Howland C.J.O. speaking for the Court in R. v. Gr......
  • Mobil Petroleum Company, Inc. v Hyundai Mobis
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 5 August 2009
    ...(1996) 35 IPR 11 (refd) Neutrogena Corp v Golden Ltd [1996] RPC 473 (refd) North Cheshire & Manchester Brewery Co v Manchester Brewery Co [1899] AC 83 (refd) Novelty Pte Ltd v Amanresorts Ltd [2009] 3 SLR (R) 216; [2009] 3 SLR 216 (refd) Pensonic Corp Sdn Bhd v Matsushita Electric Industria......
  • Buckingham v Daily News Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 June 1956
    ...statement. 18 Then he went on a little later: "It is said that in North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Co. v. Manchester Brewery Co. (1899 A.C.,83) the Lord Chancellor observed that he himself should not have required any evidence in that case, and he perhaps, in one respect, went further,......
  • Polaris Capital (Pty) Ltd v Registrar of Companies and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Registrar of Companies [1989] 4 NZCLC 64, 798: dictum at 800 applied North Cheshire and Manchester Brewery Co v Manchester Brewery Co [1899] AC 83: referred Sika (NZ) Ltd v Sika Technology Ltd [1992] MCLR 264: dictum at 266 - 267 applied C South Pacific Airlines of New Zealand v Registrar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT