North Essex District Health Authority v Spargo

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date13 March 1997
Date13 March 1997
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Nourse, Lord Justice Brooke and Lord Justice Waller

Spargo
and
North Essex District Health Authority

Limitation of actions - date of plaintiff's knowledge of injury - subjective test to be applied

Subjective test for dating knowledge of injury

To establish the date of a plaintiff's knowledge as to the causation of his injury for the purposes of the Limitation Act 1980, a subjective test was to be applied: what the plaintiff himself knew and not what would have been the reasonable layman's state of mind in the absence of expert confirmation.

The Court of Appeal so held in reserved judgments allowing an appeal by the defendant, North Essex District Health Authority, from the judgment on the trial of a preliminary issue whereby Mr Justice Collins had declared that the claim of the plaintiff, Jose Ann Spargo, for damages for injury caused as a result of mistaken medical diagnosis was not statute barred by sections 11 and 14 of the 1980 Act.

Mr Terence Coghlan, QC, for the health authority; Mr Simeon Maskrey, QC and Mr Andrew Buchan for the plaintiff.

LORD JUSTICE BROOKE said that the plaintiff, now aged 67, complained that a negligent diagnosis made 22 years ago had led to her being detained in a psychiatric hospital from 1975 until 1981, much longer than was necessary, and had had a catastrophic effect on her life.

In April 1975, having been found wandering about in her nightdress in an emaciated state, she had been compulsorily admitted to hospital. The consultant psychiatrist had diagnosed the plaintiff as suffering from selective brain damage resulting from excessive purging and dieting. It was now common ground that that diagnosis was mistaken.

The writ in the action was issued in 1993, 12 years after the plaintiff's release from hospital. Her charge of professional negligence was based on failure, once the diagnosis was made, to refer her to a neurologist for further investigations including a brain scan.

The judge found that the plaintiff did not have the requisite knowledge for the purposes of section 11(4) of the 1980 Act until a date not more than three years before she issued her writ so that her action was not statute barred.

Section 14(1) provided that references to a person's date of knowledge were "references to the date on which he first had knowledge of the following facts - (a) that the injury in question was significant; and (b) that the injury was attributable in whole or in part to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
99 cases
  • Gough v Neary & Cronin
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 July 2003
    ...to constitute negligence. Hallam-Eames v. Merrett Syndicates Ltd. [1996] 7 Med L.R. 122 and Spargo v. North Essex Health Authority [1997] 8 Med L.R. 125 approved. Per Geoghegan J.: That in order for the statute to run, a plaintiff must know enough facts as would be capable of at least, upon......
  • Mary Theresa Harrison v Isle of Wight NHS Primary Care Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 8 March 2013
    ...involves two requirements, knowledge of the nature of the act or omission and of the identity of the defendant. 40 In Spargo v North Essex District Health Authority (1997) PIQR p235 at page 242 Brooke LJ set out the following principles in respect of the test under section 14:- "(1) The kno......
  • Mullins v Irish Prison Service
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 July 2018
    ...relation to the equivalent limitation period in the United Kingdom, in the case of Spargo v. North Essex District Health Authority [1997] 8 Med. L.R. 125 wherein Brooke L.J. stated that the principles to be applied in the interpretation of the statutory provisions in the United Kingdom are......
  • Green v Hardiman
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 January 2017
    ... ... THE HIGH COURT Health – Medical Negligence – Breach of Duty of Care ... were treated for some three weeks by a district nurse and his dressings changed. He had while at ... English Court of Appeal in the case of Spargo v. North Essex Health Authority [1977] 8 Med ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Stretching Time Limits
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 30 September 2001
    ...situation where claimants who lack capacity face no time limit at all. That at least would be better news for defendants. FOOTNOTES (1997) 8 Med LR 125 LTL 29/06/2001 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT