Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Nurdin and Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden and Company Ltd

Weekly Law Reports The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 21 Cited in 29 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date05 February 1999
Date05 February 1999
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v (1) Commissioners of Inland Revenue (2) Hm Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 18 July 2003
    ... ... DBAG Deutsche Bank AC, a German company and the parent company, direct or indirect of DBI and DMG ... ...
  • Mortgage Express v Lambert
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 June 2016
    ...Council (1993) 68 P & CR 1; Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 and Nurdin & Peacock plc v DB Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249. Completion of the transfer to the buyers and completion of the charge financing it were not contemporaneous as entitlement to have the transac......
  • Investment Trust Companies ((in Liquidation)) v Revenue and Customs Comrs
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 March 2012
    ...had been "rather over-analytical in his approach", and at [143] expressed his agreement with what Neuberger J had said in Nurdin & Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249, 1272: "For the issue of recoverability to turn upon a nice analysis as to the precise nature of the mista......
  • Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 November 2008
    ...respectfully agree with Lord Walker's endorsement (in paragraph 143) of the observation of Neuberger J (as he then was) in Nurdin & Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249 at 1272: “For the issue of recoverability to turn upon a nice analysis as to the precise nature of the mi......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...of Appeal (at [25]) approved of the test of liability laid down in the English case of Nurdin & Peacock plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd[1999] 1 All ER 941 at 963, that: “[I]n order to found a claim for repayment of money paid under a mistake of law, it is necessary for the payer to establish not......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT