Nurdin and Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden and Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date05 February 1999
Date05 February 1999
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 October 2006
    ...I respectfully think that he was rather over-analytical in his approach. I agree with the observation of Neuberger J in Nurdin & Peacock plc v D D B Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999]1 WLR 1249, 1272: "For the issue of recoverability to turn upon a nice analysis as to the precise nature of the mistak......
  • Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 February 2005
    ...Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2003] 3 WLR 1603 HL (" Marcic"). On the section 32(1)(c) issues we were referred to Nurdin & Peacock plc v. D. B. Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249 (a decision of Neuberger J) (" Nurdin"). 50 Also cited to us on the cause of action issue was the decision of the ......
  • Investment Trust Companies ((in Liquidation)) v Revenue and Customs Comrs
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 March 2012
    ...approach", and at [143] expressed his agreement with what Neuberger J had said in Nurdin & Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249, 1272: "For the issue of recoverability to turn upon a nice analysis as to the precise nature of the mistake of law appears to me to be al......
  • Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 November 2008
    ...respectfully agree with Lord Walker's endorsement (in paragraph 143) of the observation of Neuberger J (as he then was) in Nurdin & Peacock Plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 1249 at 1272: “For the issue of recoverability to turn upon a nice analysis as to the precise nature of the mi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...of Appeal (at [25]) approved of the test of liability laid down in the English case of Nurdin & Peacock plc v D B Ramsden & Co Ltd[1999] 1 All ER 941 at 963, that: “[I]n order to found a claim for repayment of money paid under a mistake of law, it is necessary for the payer to establish not......