Oastler v Henderson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1876
Year1876

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
37 cases
  • Fong Holdings Pte Ltd v Computer Library (S) Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 9 May 1991
  • Levett-Dunn and Others v NHS Property Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 26 April 2016
    ...acts might each be only equivocal. With this in mind – (2) The test is whether the landlord's conduct is 'so' inconsistent ( Oastler v Henderson 1877 2 QBD 575 at 577) with the continuation of the tenant's lease that it could only be justified as being lawful on the basis that the landlord ......
  • Re Edwards' Will Trusts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 February 1981
    ...that such jurisdiction was vested in them by section 19 of the Act of 1873. The latter is, I think, the better view. 27 In 1877, in Oastler v. Henderson, 2 Queen's Bench Division, 575, an action in the Queen's Bench Division to recover arrears of rent was tried before a judge alone, who ent......
  • EDWARD LEE & Company Ltd v N1 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 November 2012
    ...IR 204; Lambert v M'Donnell (1864) 15 ICLR 136; Lynch v Lynch (1843) 6 ILR 131; Neville v Harman (1883) 17 ILTR 86; Oastler v Henderson (1877) 2 QBD 575; O'Reilly v Mercer (1865) 10 IJNS 149; PW & Co v Milton Gate Investments Ltd [2003] EWHC 1994 (Ch), [2004] Ch 142; Lord Ranelagh v Melton ......
  • Get Started for Free