Obestain Inc. v National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd (Sanix Ace)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1987 |
Year | 1987 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
-
Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc (also Shell U.K. Ltd & others v Total UK Ltd and Another)
...in many ways than that of a bare trustee having no more than the legal title. 137 Lord Grabiner relied on Obestain Inc v National Mineral Development Corporation (The Sanix Ace) [1987] 1 Lloyds Rep 465 to submit that the legal owner is always entitled to recover the value of lost goods (or ......
- Wibau Maschinenfabric Hartman S.A. v Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company (Chanda)
-
Sevylor Shipping and Trading Corporation v Altfadul Company for Foods, Fruits & Livestock
...and said that support for it is also to be found in The Aramis [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 213, The Athenian Harmony [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 410, The Sanix Ace [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 465, Scrutton on Charterparties 23 rd Ed., Article 212, Voyage Charters 4 th Ed., para. 18.91, and the Law Commission......
-
East West Corporation v DKBS 1912 (East West Corporation v Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 A/S)
...Commission's decision not to recommend any exclusion of the right of an owner to sue in tort. It referred to Obestain Inc. v. National Mineral Development Corp. Ltd. (The Sanix Ace) [1987] 1 Ll.R. 465, where Hobhouse J (as he then was) at p.468 affirmed an owner's right to recover damages (......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Cargo Interests in Australia: Standing on the Edge - Imbalances that Permeate International Sale Contracts, Carriage Contracts and Recovery Rights
...an insurance indemnity is denied, or consequential losses are significant, or for any other commercial reason. To 67 The Sanix Ace [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 465. 68 Tetley, above n 29, 152-153. 69 Leigh & Sillivan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd (The Aliakmon) [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1; see also The......