Ogilvie v Littleboy

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1897
Year1897
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
48 cases
  • Pitt and another v Holt and another; Futter and another v Futter and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 March 2011
    ...page 400. He dismissed the action. In turn the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords dismissed Mrs Ogilvie's appeals; the reports are Ogilvie v Littleboy (1897) 13 TLR 399 and Ogilvie v Allen (1899) 15 TLR 294 . Lindley LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said at 13 TLR 400 : "Gi......
  • Philip Anton Van Der Merwe v Deborah Lynne Goldman and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 April 2016
    ...acted under some mistake of so serious a character as to render it unjust on the part of the donee to retain the gift: [101], quoting Ogilvie v Littleboy (1897) 13 TLR 399 at 400; (2) a mistake is to be distinguished from mere inadvertence or misprediction: [104]; (3) forgetfulness, inadver......
  • Brazzill and Others v Willoughby and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 May 2010
    ...mistaken, he would not have made the gifts. 85 Lewison J held the relevant principle of law to be as set out by the Court of Appeal in Ogilvie v Littleboy (1897) 13 TLR 399 (upheld in the House of Lords as Ogilvie v Allen (1899) 15 TLR 294), namely that: "Where there is no fraud, no undue i......
  • Roadchef (Employee Benefits Trustees) Ltd v Timothy Ingram Hill and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 January 2014
    ...nature of the transaction or as to some matter of fact or law basic to it: see at [122]. 134 The Supreme Court applied the test in Ogilvie v. Littleboy 13 TLR 399 at 400 where Lindley J said, "…a donor can only obtain back property which he has given away by showing that he was under some ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • The Law Of Mistake: In B -v- C, D And E In The Matter Of The A Trust [2009] JRC 245
    • Jersey
    • Mondaq Jersey
    • 24 February 2010
    ...a review was carried out of the English Law of Mistake. In particular significant reference was made to the case of Ogilvie v Littleboy (1897) 13 TLR 399 in the Court of Appeal, a case which was not referred to in Gibbon v Mitchell. This case set out that to have the property returned to hi......
2 books & journal articles
  • Trust Parties’ Uniquely Easy Access to Rescission: Analysis, Critique and Reform
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 82-5, September 2019
    • 1 September 2019
    ...A. Cloherty, ‘Playing the “Get Out of JailFree” Card: Mistake in the Law of Trusts’ (2010) 14 Jersey and Guernsey Law Review 1, 21.17 (1897) 13 TLR 399, 400.18 [1990] 1 WLR 1304, 1309; and see Ashdown, n 7 above, 184–185. Writing extra-judicially,Lord Millett opined that to be set aside in ......
  • Equity and Trusts
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...regard, the relevant test to rescind a gift is the serious mistake test as articulated as follows by Lindley LJ in Ogilvie v Littleboy[1897] 13 TLR 399 at 400: In the absence of all circumstances of suspicion a donor can only obtain back property which he has given away by showing that he w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT