Ollett v Jordan
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1918 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft fur Mineralole mbH & Company v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady)
...reasonable in the circumstances, which means a time for the normal transit to the destination, and for disposal after.” Similarly, in Ollett v. Jordan [1918] 2 KB 41, cited by Diplock J at 868, Atkin J had said at 47: “…the condition that the goods must be merchantable means that they must ......
-
Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft fur Mineralole mbH & Company v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady)
...to consider the other two contentions. 18 In his judgement, Mr Justice Atkin had not misread Beer v Walker, a pre-1893 Act case, in Ollet v Jordan [1918] 2 KB 41. In Beer v Walker, a quantity of Ostend rabbits had been sold that was to be shipped by the seller from London to Brighton. The r......
-
KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineralöle mbH & Company v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady)
...(The Reborn)UNK [2009] EWCA Civ 531; [2009] 1 CLC 909. Navigas Ltd v Enron Liquid Fuels Ltd (unreported, 22 May 1998). Ollett v JordanELR [1918] 2 KB 41. Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport LtdELR [1980] AC 827. Pinnock Bros v Lewis & Peat LtdELR [1923] 1 KB 690. Sirius International......
-
Kulkarni v Manor Credit (Davenham) Ltd
...night, other beer would have had to be supplied to the men on the Sunday morning” (at 219). There was no sufficient appropriation. 32 In Ollett v. Jordan [1918] 2 KB 41 the sale was of herrings, despatched by rail by a seller in Hull to a buyer in Eastbourne. The issue under the Public Heal......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
In the Scottish Courts
...cases, the most instructive are Crane v.Lawrence (25 Q.B.D., 152);McNairv. Terroni(1915,1K.B.,526);and O/lett v. Jordan (1918, 2K.B., 41). Thesecases were all cited in course of the argument before theHighCourtof Justiciaryandasummary of their main factsandof the findings of the English jud......