Oram v Hutt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1913
Year1913
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Martell v Consett Iron Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 3 February 1955
    ...may incidentally arise". 30 Next in the sequence of Sir Andrew's argument, though not in order of date, comes the case in this Court of Oram v. Hutt, 1914 1 Chancery, page 98. The question in that case was whether the payment by a Trade Union of the costs of a slander action brought by one ......
  • Hill v Archbold
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 June 1967
    ...8 This new approach means that we must look afresh at the previous cases. In particular at two cases on which Mr Hill relies. The first is Oram v. Hutt, 1914, 1 Chancery, p. 98. In that case a man had slandered the general secretary of a trade union, accusing him of misconduct in the affai......
  • Shah v Karanjia
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Murphy v Young & Company 's Brewery Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 January 1997
    ...the union, who had been unsuccessful plaintiffs in a libel action. It was contended that such support constituted the tort of maintenance. Oram v. Hutt [1914] 1 Ch.98 was relied upon in support of this submission. In the leading judgment Lord Denning M.R. rejected this submission at 27I do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT