Ord v Ord

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1923
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
55 cases
  • Dato' Teong Teck Leng v Dato' Teong Teck Kim
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Bell v Holmes
    • United Kingdom
    • Assizes
    • Invalid date
  • Khan v Golechha International Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 February 1980
    ...am not intendingto refer to all the cases, but there are extracts from three which I would like to read. First., for the general principle, Ord v. Ord (1923) 2KB, 432,439. I need not narrate the facts. I will start at the second paragraph on page 439. "The words "res judicata" explain thems......
  • Chidambaram v Nair
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1964
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1962 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...152. 354 Okeke v. Commissioner of Police 12 W.A.C.A. 203. 79 Olawoyin v. Attorney-General, N.R., (1961) All N.L.R. 169 280 Ord. v. Ord. (1923) 2 K.B. 432; (1923) All E.R. Rep. 206; 92 L.J.K.B. 859; 129 I.t. 605; 39 T.L.R. 437. 376 Orion Property Trust, Ltd., v. Du Cane Court, Ltd. 420 Oso v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT