Orr v Diaper

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1876
Date1876

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • Blythe v The Commissioner of an Garda Síochána
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 23 October 2023
    ...being sought in the “ special circumstances” of the case (at 182B-D). 56 Viscount Dilhorne thought that the decision in Orr v Diaper (1876) 4 Ch D 92 (also reported at 25 WR 23 and 46 LJ Ch 41) established that discovery could be granted against a person “ who is not a mere witness to disco......
  • Ricci v Chow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 June 1987
    ...representatives of a company to be interrogated and on Moodalay v. Morton, (1785) 1 Bro.C.C. 469, Fenton v. Hughes, (1802) 7 Ves.Jun.287, Orr v. Diaper, (1876) 4 Ch D.92 and 25 W.R.23, Post v. Toledo Cincinatti and St. Louis Railroad Co., (1887) 11 N.E.Rep.540, and Upmann v. Elkan, (1871) L......
  • R Omar Awadh Omar Habib Sulieman Njoroge and Another v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 June 2012
    ...may in such circumstances be obtained, though I think the court, perhaps misled by the fact that they had available only the report at 4 Ch.D. 92, may have been wrong in saying that in Orr v Diaper the plaintiffs neither alleged that they had a cause of action nor intended to sue the defend......
  • Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 July 1972
    ...marks or passing off, and in particular Eunt v. Maniere (1864) 34 Beavan 157: Upmann v. Elkan (1871) L.R. 12 Eq. L40; Orr v. Diaper (1876) 4 Ch. D. 92, but much more fully and better reported in 25 W.R. 23. Those were cases of wharfingers, forwarding agents or shippers who were importing or......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles