Orr v Dickinson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHigh Court of Chancery
Judgment Date01 January 1858
Date01 January 1858

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
67 cases
6 firm's commentaries
  • Balancing Act: Supreme Court Rules That Filing A Proof Of Claim For Stale Debt Does Not Violate The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 28 July 2017
    ...to repayment after the expiration of the limitations period under applicable state law. The Court's decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson1 resolved a split among the federal courts of appeal about the application of the FDCPA to proofs of claim in bankruptcy proceedings. While the dec......
  • Waiver Of Torts As A New Cause Of Action
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 January 2012
    ...published on www.internationallawoffice.com The Ontario Divisional Court heard an appeal of the decision in Serhan Estate v Johnson and Johnson1 to certify a product liability class action. The motions judge held that the material facts pleaded could sustain an action based on the equitable......
  • Avoiding 'Obnoxious' Choices Of Law And Restrictive Covenants In Employment Agreements
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 4 March 2014
    ...was on notice that the covenant was too broad when it imposed the agreement on the employee. The decision, Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson,1 shows that multi-state employers cannot count on applying their home-state law to restrictive covenants with employees in other states and are at r......
  • Another Step Forward In The Enforcement Of Noncompetes
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 29 April 2009
    ...contracts with at-will employees will be enforced that was first announced by the same court in Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Johnson.1 In Sheshunoff, the announced that the focus should be shifted back from overly strict technical requirements to the reasonableness of the restric......
  • Get Started for Free
75 books & journal articles
  • 'n' guilty men.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 146 No. 1, November 1997
    • 1 November 1997
    ...Noriega did not give a citation. See id. (48) See Exodus 20:1-:17. (49) Genesis 1:1. "Someone" may have had precepts back then too. See John 1:1 ("In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was (50) Letter from Benjamin Franklin to Benjamin Vaughan, supra note 13......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...against negligent manufacturers and distributors of defective products. A recent decision from Ontario, Serhan Estate v. Johnson & Johnson,1 has the potential to significantly ease the burden in certifying class action proceedings for products liability as well as perhaps enabling plaintiff......
  • An Old Snail in a New Bottle? Waiver of Tort as An Independent Cause of Action
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...against negligent manufacturers and distributors of defective products. A recent decision from Ontario, Serhan Estate v. Johnson & Johnson,1 has the potential to significantly ease the burden in certifying class action proceedings for products liability as well as perhaps enabling plaintiff......
  • Waiving Goodbye: The Rise and Imminent Fall of Waiver of Tort in Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • 1 April 2010
    ...against negligent manufacturers and distributors of defective products. A recent decision from Ontario, Serhan Estate v. Johnson & Johnson,1 has the potential to significantly ease the burden in certifying class action proceedings for products liability as well as perhaps enabling plaintiff......
  • Get Started for Free
31 provisions
  • Local Government Board's Provisional Orders Confirmation (No.13) Act 1892
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1892
    ...Will of Samuel Simms, viz., Joseph Tetley, Sampson Slater. -- William Auty. 299 Workshop - 303 304 Shed - Outbuildings - - William Gledhill, John 1 Gledhill. ditto - -I- [Ch. ccii.] .Zoccd Govenzme& Boct~d's [S5 & 56 VICT.] Provisionnl Orders ConJirmution (No, 13) Act, 1892. A.D. lhG2. - --......
  • PL 113-291, HR 3979 – Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
    • United States
    • US session laws and acts U.S. Public Laws
    • 1 January 2014
    ...from August 7 to August 9, 1918, during World War I for which he was originally awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. (b) Henry Johnson.-- (1) Waiver of time limitations.--Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time li......
  • Midland Railway Act 1900
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1900
    ...protection of fcthe vestry of that parish A.D. 1900: (in this section called " the vestry ") the following provisions shall f s~7 apply: ? John (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Act contained the Company HamPstead- shall not appropriate stop up or permanently interfere with the footway i......
  • Glasgow Corporation Sewage Order Confirmation Act 1935
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1935
    ...said sludge main. Forprotec- 71. The following provisions for the protection of ^on ^ Archibald John Campbell Colquhoun residing at Ballaig John1 a near C^eff the proprietor of the lands hereinafter in this Campbell section referred to and his successors and assignees Colquhoun. (in this se......
  • Get Started for Free