Otto v Bolton & Norris
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Dutton v Bognor Regis Urban District Council
...insurance company, claimed that he was exempted entirely from liability by the decision of Bottomley v. Bannister (1932) 1 K. B.4595 and Otto v. Bolton (1936) 1 K. B.45. On that account Mrs. Dutton settled the claim against the builder for £625. But Mrs. Dutton went on against the Bognor Re......
- Hong Leong Finance Bhd and Another; Kluang Wood Products Sdn Bhd and Another
-
McGowan v Harrison
...defendant that the house was fit for habitation. Accordingly the plaintiff's action was unsustainable. Otto v. Bolton and NorrisELR, [1936] 2 K. B. 46, followed. (H.C., S.C.), McGowan and Harrison Alleged breach - Sale of house - Sale by way of underlease -Whether "a contract for letting fo......
-
Siney v Corporation of Dublin
...v. Jones 186315 C.B. (N.S. 221), Cavalier v. Pope 1906 A.C. 428, Bottomley v. Bannister 1932 1 K.B. 458, Otto v. Bolton andNorris 1936 2 K.B. 46, Davis v. Foot 1941 K.B. 116, McGowan v. Harris 1941 I.R. 331, Chambers v. CorkCorporation 1959 I.L.T.R. 45. The immunity originated as an immun......
Request a trial to view additional results