OU v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Perez |
| Neutral Citation | [2024] UKUT 223 (AAC) |
| Published date | 05 September 2024 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
Page 1 of 11 OU (for SRU) UA-2024-000693-DLA
[2024] UKUT 223 (AAC)
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
UA-2024-000693-DLA
[2024] UKUT 223 (AAC)
THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
(statutory instrument number 2008/2698)
Applicant: OU (mother and appointee for SRU)
Tribunal: The First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Tribunal Case No: SC124/23/03184 &1696-5010-6442-7101
Tribunal Venue: Remote: part video, part telephone
Hearing Date: 12 March 2024
Respondent: The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
28 July 2024
1. This permission to appeal application was received in time on 24 May
2024. The deadline was 10 June 2024.
2. I refuse permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
3. I do not grant an oral hearing of this application.
REASONS
Reasons for not granting an oral hearing
4. The appointee’s stated reasons for requesting an oral hearing rehearse
her detailed written grounds for seeking permission to appeal. Those grounds
do not disclose any arguable error of law, as I explain below. Rehearsing the
grounds orally would make no difference to their merits. Holding an oral hearing
for the appointee to rehearse the grounds orally would merely give false hope.
Reasons for refusing permission to appeal
5. There is no arguable error of law, for the following reasons.
6. I have grouped the submissions into numbered grounds.
To continue reading
Request your trial