P v P (Financial Provision: Clean Break: Costs Schedule and Schedule to Judgment)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Parra v Parra
...not in any way concerned with those issues which are not the subject of appeal. The judge's judgment has subsequently been reported at [2002] 2 FLR 1075. The structure of that part of the judgment with which we are concerned emerges from its sub-headings. The judge turned first to introduce......
-
Abdulla v Abdulla
...event of a sale of the husband's shareholding within five years from the date of this order.” 24 In Parra v. Parra [2002] EWHC 887, [2002] 2 F.L.R. 1075 Justice Charles at first instance also deviated from equality in circumstances where there was a lack of liquidity and difficulties in bor......
-
Rampersad v Rampersad
...therein, resulting in an unequal distribution. 39 Justice Coleridge's sentiments were echoed by Charles, J. in Parra v. Parra [2002] 2 F.L.R. 1075 where he held that the lack of liquidity of a company, difficulties in borrowing and the nature of the assets, might justify a departure from th......
-
Mimi Kar Kee Wong Hung (Also Known As Mimi Kar Gee Wong Hung) v Raymond Kin Sang Hung
...case regarded the clawback order as being “highly exceptional”: see Parra at para [29]. [41] See the decision of the trial judge: P v P [2002] 2 FLR 1075, at para [42] Para 11 above. [43] According to ADHL’s Annual Report for 2011. [44] [2011] 1 FLR 64 at para [109]. [45]...
Request a trial to view additional results